Graphic Yearbook 2014
Tab. III.1 Change in the share [%] of dispersion conditions in
the year 2014 in comparison with the average for the period
2007–2013 in the CR and agglomerations
Dispersion conditions [%] |
Year | Month | |||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
| Czech Republic | |||||||||||||
| Good | -5.0 | -11.4 | 12.9 | -18.9 | -23.3 | 2.8 | 7.6 | -3.2 | -2.8 | -11.9 | -10.9 | -13.8 | 13.4 |
| Moderately poor | 4.7 | 11.4 | -4.8 | 8.3 | 23.3 | -2.3 | -7.6 | 3.7 | -0.5 | 3.8 | 7.7 | 22.4 | -9.7 |
| Poor | 0.4 | 0.0 | -8.1 | 10.6 | 0.0 | -0.5 | 0.0 | -0.5 | 3.2 | 8.1 | 3.2 | -8.6 | -3.7 |
| Agglomeration of Prague | |||||||||||||
| Good | -9.0 | -21.5 | 4.7 | -15.2 | -28.1 | -10.1 | 18.6 | -12.4 | 0.5 | -17.6 | -13.1 | -24.8 | 11.5 |
| Moderately poor | 7.3 | 14.2 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 19.0 | 11.1 | -17.6 | 15.7 | -2.8 | 11.9 | 8.2 | 14.3 | 7.4 |
| Poor | 1.8 | 7.3 | -6.5 | 11.5 | 9.0 | -0.9 | -1.0 | -3.2 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 10.5 | -18.9 |
| Agglomeration of Brno | |||||||||||||
| Good | -1.2 | -3.9 | -1.4 | -2.3 | -20.5 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 1.4 | -13.8 | -9.5 | -2.4 | 25.3 |
| Moderately poor | 0.6 | -2.4 | 6.4 | -4.1 | 21.0 | -5.5 | -2.4 | -2.3 | -3.2 | -4.8 | 7.7 | 12.9 | -14.7 |
| Poor | 0.6 | 6.4 | -5.0 | 6.5 | -0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.4 | 1.8 | 18.6 | 1.8 | -10.5 | -10.6 |
| Agglomeration of Ostrava/Karviná/Frýdek-Místek | |||||||||||||
| Good | -3.6 | -1.7 | 18.5 | -14.7 | -11.9 | 5.5 | 2.4 | -3.7 | 12.9 | -11.9 | -10.4 | -27.1 | -0.5 |
| Moderately poor | 0.9 | 3.6 | -11.5 | 7.4 | 14.3 | -4.6 | -1.9 | 2.3 | -9.7 | 2.4 | 6.8 | 6.7 | -5.1 |
| Poor | 2.7 | -1.9 | -7.0 | 7.4 | -2.4 | -0.9 | -0.5 | 1.4 | -3.2 | 9.5 | 3.6 | 20.5 | 5.5 |
