Graphic Yearbook 2016
Tab. III.1 Change in the percentage of dispersion conditions in
the year 2015 in comparison with the average for the period
2007–2014 in the CR and agglomerations
Dispersion conditions [%] |
Year | Month | |||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
| Czech Republic | |||||||||||||
| Good | 13.9 | 12.6 | 7.7 | 1.9 | 16.3 | 8.9 | 16.7 | 16.5 | 26.6 | 36.3 | 13.1 | 14.6 | -4.4 |
| Moderately poor | -10.2 | -6.2 | -0.7 | 0.5 | -16.3 | -8.5 | -16.7 | -16.1 | -26.2 | -33.3 | -3.0 | -7.1 | 10.9 |
| Poor | -3.7 | -6.5 | -7.1 | -2.4 | 0.0 | -0.4 | 0.0 | -0.4 | -0.4 | -2.9 | -10.1 | -7.5 | -6.5 |
| Agglomeration of Prague | |||||||||||||
| Good | 11.7 | 12.3 | 37.1 | 8.5 | 13.0 | 12.2 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 26.2 | 10.4 | 13.8 | 13.6 | -13.3 |
| Moderately poor | -7.0 | -13.4 | -22.1 | -1.3 | -14.4 | -11.5 | -3.3 | -0.7 | -25.1 | -9.6 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 |
| Poor | -4.6 | 1.0 | -15.0 | -7.2 | 1.5 | -0.7 | -0.7 | -2.5 | -1.1 | -0.7 | -15.9 | -19.5 | 4.3 |
| Agglomeration of Brno | |||||||||||||
| Good | 10.7 | 7.7 | 35.0 | 12.1 | -3.3 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 7.5 | 15.1 | 4.1 | 21.7 | 14.4 | -1.4 |
| Moderately poor | -6.2 | -1.5 | -27.2 | -6.6 | 3.7 | -13.3 | -3.3 | -6.5 | -13.6 | 2.2 | -5.5 | 0.8 | -3.9 |
| Poor | -4.5 | -6.1 | -7.9 | -5.4 | -0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.1 | -1.4 | -6.3 | -16.2 | -15.2 | 5.4 |
| Agglomeration of Ostrava/Karviná/Frýdek-Místek | |||||||||||||
| Good | 12.1 | 13.0 | 27.7 | 10.3 | 10.4 | 8.6 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 22.2 | -3.7 | 14.1 | 27.7 | 5.0 |
| Moderately poor | -7.8 | -8.7 | -18.6 | -8.4 | -8.5 | -7.9 | -7.4 | -2.2 | -19.7 | 4.8 | 0.6 | -13.6 | -5.0 |
| Poor | -4.3 | -4.4 | -9.1 | -1.8 | -1.9 | -0.7 | -0.4 | -1.8 | -2.5 | -1.1 | -14.7 | -14.1 | 0.0 |
