V.1 THE CAPITAL CITY OF PRAGUE

As concerns ambient air pollution, the capital city of Prague is ranked among the most loaded areas of the CR. This is the result of the interaction of a number of natural factors, particularly the effects caused by high concentration of inhabitants and the dense transport network connected with it.

The specific location of Prague in the varied terrain of the Prague basin significantly affects the climatic and dispersion conditions of its territory (Ložek et al. 2005). The Vltava river valley is usually poorly ventilated and especially in the cold half of the year there are formed favourable conditions for temperature inversions when the markedly warmer air is shifted above the cooled air near the earth surface. Heavy cold air remains near the earth and thus prevents the pollutants from dispersion into the upper layers of the atmosphere. This results in increased pollutants’ concentrations in the still ground-level layer of air (Bednář, Zikmunda 1985).

Deteriorated ambient air quality in Prague is connected mainly with significant traffic loads. Prague represents, due to its geographical position, not only the main junction of the road network in the CR but also the significant crossroad of international transit transport. A large part of main routes lead directly throughout the centre of Prague. The current communication network in the inner city, however, is not able to accommodate such huge concentration of traffic, and consequently, it is overloaded and often even collapses occur. The situation should be partly solved primarily by the completion of the ring roads around Prague, by considerable reduction of private cars in the most loaded areas and the emphasis on the railway and public transport (IPR Praha 2012).

With regard to its historical development, Prague has also the developed industrial infrastructure (IPR Praha 2012). In spite of the fact that recently a lot of industrial plants not complying with the set conditions for their operation have been closed or reduced their production, there is a growing focus on the sector of services. Consequently, new commercial and administrative centres have been built which makes high demands on transport services and consumption of energies, incl. heating.

Also consumption of fossil fuels for household heating in family houses mainly in the city outskirts has a considerable influence on the current air pollution situation in Prague.


V.1.1 Air quality in the agglomeration of Prague
 
Suspended particles PM10 and PM2.5

In 2013 the limit value for the average 24-hour concentration of PM10 (the value 50 µg.m-3 must not be exceeded more than 35x in one year) was exceeded in the territory of the Prague agglomeration in 5 of 15 localities with sufficient number of data for the evaluation (in 2012 the limit value was exceeded in 6 of 15 localities used for the evaluation in 2013). Three of the above five localities are classified as traffic localities, one as industrial and one as suburban background locality. At approximately half of the stations both the average 24-hour concentration and the number of exceedances of the limit value decreased or stagnated, the other half of the stations, on the contrary, recorded a slight increase. After more detailed analysis it can be stated that in 2013 the slight decrease of the average 24-hour concentration continued separately at traffic and background stations. The difference between the average 24-hour concentration at traffic stations and at background stations continues to decrease as well – in 2013 it was lower than 3 µg.m-3 (Fig. V.I.1).

In 2013, similarly as in the previous years, the annual PM10 limit value (40 µg.m-3) was not exceeded in any locality of 16 localities relevant for the evaluation of annual concentrations. The average annual concentrations at traffic stations and at background stations stagnate (Fig. V.1.2).

As a rule, high concentrations of suspended PM10 and PM2.5 particles and the most frequent exceedances of 24-hour limit value for PM10 are reached in the cold period of the year due to the higher emissions of TSP caused both by higher intensity of heating (incl. local heating) and higher emissions from traffic (increased abrasion of road surface by spreading and the subsequent re-suspension of the abraded material; EC 2011), both by less favourable meteorological conditions for the dispersion of pollutants. In the agglomeration of Prague the level of 24-hour limit value was exceeded most frequently in the months January–March. The stations where the limit value for 24-hour concentration of PM10 was exceeded, reached during the first three months from 50 % to 100 % of the permissible number of limit value exceedances (Fig. V.I.3) when, due to generally lower temperatures, most unfavourable dispersion conditions prevailed (Tolazs 2014; Chapter III). With regard to above-the-average temperatures during November and December, the number of exceedances at the end of the year was lower in comparison to the year 2012.

The limit value for average annual concentrations of suspended PM2.5 particles was exceeded in 2013 at one of four stations with sufficient number of data for the evaluation. The limit value was exceeded at the station Prague 2-Legerova classified as a traffic station (hot spot). The PM2.5 concentrations were measured there for the second time and the year-to-year comparison shows the increase by more than 5 µg.m-3. The remaining localities (Prague 2-Riegrovy sady, Prague 5-Smíchov and Prague 5-Stodůlky), for which data are available for the years 2012 and 2013, did not record any marked changes in the values of average annual PM2.5 concentrations (Fig. V.I.4).

The trend of air pollution characteristics for PM10 is evaluated on the basis of data from the stations for which there exists the complete time series starting in the 90’s (Fig. V.2). The steep drop of PM10 concentrations was recorded from 1996 to 1999. Then the concentrations increased again and in the period after the year 2000, in the year 2003, the so far maximum levels are reached due to unfavourable dispersion conditions in February and December and due to subnormal precipitation amounts. Since the year 2003 the overall trend of air pollution has had a decreasing character, nevertheless there were fluctuationsin individual years, mainly due to meteorological and dispersion conditions. Higher PM10 concentrations were measured for instance in the years 2006, 2010 and 2011. The 2013 concentrations reach the similar levels as those in the year 2012. The average annual PM10 concentrations remain below the level of the respective limit value starting from the year 2004. On the contrary, the 36th highest daily concentrations of PM10 with regard to the level of the daily limit value, show fluctuations.


Nitrogen dioxide

The hourly limit value 200 µg.m-3 was exceeded in the locality Prague 2-Legerova 6x and in the locality Prague 5-Smíchov 2x. The permissible number of exceedances is 18. The hourly limit value for NO2 (200 µg.m-3) was thus not exceeded in any of these localities in 2013.

With regard to the exceedance of the limit value in Prague, there is a problem mainly with the traffic station Prague 2-Legerova (hot spot) where NO2 has been measured since 2003. This station is aimed at monitoring air pollution caused by traffic. In 2013, for the second time since 2003, the hourly limit value was not reached at this station (Fig. V.I.5).

The annual limit value for NO2 (40 µg.m-3) was exceeded in one of 14 localities in the territory of the Prague agglomeration (Fig. V.I.6), and namely in the locality Prague 2-Legerova (the annual average concentration reached the value of 53.6 µg.m-3). In 2013, for the first time after several years, the traffic station Prague 5-Smíchov did not record the exceedance of the annual limit value.

Generally, it can be stated that NO2 concentrations in the territory of the agglomeration of Prague decreased in most localities in the year-to-year comparison. The average annual concentrations of NO2 decreased again, and namely at almost 70 % of the stations. The decrease was recorded in total average both at background stations and at traffic stations (Fig. V.I.6). However, it can be expected that the exceedance of the limit values can occur also in other localities exposed to traffic, where there are no measurements.

The trend of air pollution characteristics for NO2 is evaluated on the basis of data from the stations for which there exists the complete time series starting in the 90’s (Fig. V.I). The downward trend of NO2 concentrations of the 90’s stopped in 2000 and, on the contrary, the NO2 concentrations were increasing up to 2003 when there were recorded similar concentration levels as those measured in 1996. Higher concentrations of NO2 in 2003 were caused both by unfavourable dispersion conditions in February and December and by subnormal precipitation amounts. Since 2003 the air pollution characteristic of NO2 have not shown any marked trends – in global they decrease, in the year-to-year comparison, however, there are fluctuations mainly according to the prevailing meteorological and dispersion conditions. The increase of both the annual average concentration and the 19th highest 1-hour concentration was recorded in 2006 and 2011. Since 2011 air pollution characteristics of NO2 have had a very slight decreasing trend. From the beginning of the evaluated period air pollution characteristics of NO2 remain below the level of their respective limit values.

Benzo[a]pyrene

Problems are still caused by benzo[a]pyrene concentrations which in 2013 exceeded again the annual limit value at the station Prague 4-Libuš. In the year-to-year comparison the annual average concentration increased both at the station Prague 4Libuš and at the second station Prague 10-Šrobárova, where the limit value 1 ng.m-3 was reached. Benzo[a]pyrene concentrations in the evaluated period starting with the year 2000 reached the highest level in 2006; since then they do not show any marked trend and they fluctuate around the limit value 1 ng.m-3 (Fig. V.I.7).


Ground-level ozone

In 2012 (in the average for 3 years 2010–2012) the limit value for the ground-level ozone was exceeded in the suburban background locality Prague 6Suchdol where the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average reached 122.6 µg.m-3 . The exceedances of the limit value in this locality occurred within the evaluated period repeatedly every year, in 2013 the limit value was exceeded 27.3x in the average for three years (the permissible number of exceedances is 25). Further high levels of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average, however not reaching the limit value, were recorded in the locality Prague 4Libuš (118.5 µg.m-3). Other stations measuring ground-level ozone in the territory of the agglomeration of Prague did not exceed the limit value (Fig. V.I.8). The lowest concentrations are measured at the traffic station Prague 9-Vysočany, which corresponds to the formation of ground-level ozone and the course of its concentrations (Chapter IV.4.3).


Other pollutants

As concerns other pollutants listed in the legislation (CO, SO2, benzene, heavy metals), the limit values are successfully met in the agglomeration of Prague in the long term. The concentrations of SO2, Ni and Cd exceeded the respective limit values at several stations in the 90’s; after the year 2000 there occurred above-the-limit annual average concentrations of arsenic at the station Prague 5Řeporyje, for the last time in 2011. Nevertheless, the concentrations of these substances also respond to the prevailing meteorological and dispersion conditions, and thus the increase of several air pollution characteristics of these pollutants was recorded e.g. in the years 2003, 2006, 2010 or 2011.

V.1.2 Emissions in the agglomeration of Prague

At present there are 2,400 individually registered plants – sources of ambient air pollution in the territory of the agglomeration of Prague included in the REZZO 1 and REZZO 2 database. However, only several of them have their significant contribution to total emissions, primarily the cement plant Cementárna Radotín and the heating plant Teplárna Malešice (Pražská teplárenská, a. s. – PT, a. s.), the incineration plant of communal waste of Pražské služby, other thermal energy sources of PT, a. s., and the industrial plants, e.g. tyre manufacturer MITAS, a. s. In the recent period also the share of emissions from the production of electric energy in cogeneration units has increased (e.g. ÚČOV PVaK and TEDOM Daewo-Avia Letňany). As concerns heating in households and in the communal sector there prevail central sources of heat energy (about 52 % of flats) and gas boiler stations and local gas boilers (about 31 % of flats). Significant share is contributed by electrical heating (about 5 %) and other types of heating difficult to classify (relatively high share of about 10 %). Only in a small part of the housing stock, primarily in the city outskirts, coal, wood and coke are used for heating.
 
In the period 2002–2012 all monitored emissions decreased in the above significant sources. As concerns heat generating sources, the decrease is connected with the implementation of the large-scale project on interlinking the thermal energy supply system Mělník-Prague. The essential decrease of SO2 emissions is related to reducing the amount of hard coal combusted in the heating plant in Malešice (starting from 2011).

In the nationwide perspective the emission load of Prague is rather specific. The sources monitored as point sources and area sources operated in the territory of Prague have, except for some of them, minor significance, and the highest share of emissions is caused by traffic (Fig. V.I.11). With regard to the fact that significant sources have usually high stacks, their share in air pollution is recorded often in the areas outside Prague.

The decrease in reported TSP emissions of REZZO 2 sources is in fact influenced to a certain extent by the change of the reporting methodology as concerns emissions from quarries based on the implementation of the provision on the method of ascertaining the amount of emissions.


V.1.3 Conclusion

The capital city of Prague is an area where a lot of people are exposed to ambient air pollution. In the agglomeration of Prague the limit values for suspended particles, nitrogen dioxide and benzo[a]pyrene are exceeded in the long term. The limit value for ground-level ozone is exceeded in the outskirts of Prague. Most of the limit values exceedances are connected with significant traffic loads of the capital, but also with household heating, mainly in the built-up areas with family houses. The share of mobile sources in total emissions of TSP in the agglomeration of Prague amounts to more than 85 %, in total emissions of NOx to approximately 75 %.

Generally it can be stated that air pollution situation in the territory of the agglomeration of Prague in 2013 is comparable with the year 2012. Air pollution characteristics of PM10 particles area stagnant, nevertheless the limit value for the average 24-hour concentration of PM10 was exceeded again at several stations. The annual average concentrations of NO2 slightly decreased, the limit value was exceeded only at the traffic station Prague 2-Legerova (hot spot). The concentrations of benzo[a]pyrene and PM2.5 particles slightly decreased in comparison with the year 2012. The numbers of exceedances of the limit value for ground-level ozone in the territory of the Prague agglomeration have remained at approximately same level for several years. As concerns further pollutants, there is no problem to meet their respective limit values.



Fig. V.1 Trends of SO2, NO2 and CO (1996–2013) and benzene (2005–2013) annual characteristics in agglomerations
 

Fig. V.2 Trends of PM10 (1996–2013), PM2,5 (2004–2013) and benzo[a]pyrene (2005–2013) annual characteristics in agglomerations
 

Fig. V.1.1 Number of exceedances of 24-hour PM10 limit value in selected localities and the 36th highest 24-hour concentration PM10 at individual types of stations, agglomeration of Prague, 2006–2013
 

Fig. V.1.2 Average annual PM10 concentrations in selected localities and at individual types of stations, agglomeration of Prague, 2006–2013
 

Fig. V.1.3 Number of days with concentrations of PM10 > 50 µg.m-3 in individual months, incl. total number of exceedances, agglomeration of Prague, 2013
 

Fig. V.1.4 Average annual PM2.5 concentrations, agglomeration of Prague, 2004–2013
 

Fig. V.1.5 Numbers of exceedances of the hourly limit value for NO2 at the traffic station Prague 2-Legerova (hot spot), agglomeration of Prague, 2003–2013
 

Fig. V.1.6 Average annual NO2 concentrations in selected localities and at individual types of stations, agglomeration of Prague, 2006–2013
 

Fig. V.1.7 Average annual benzo[a]pyrene concentrations, agglomeration of Prague, 2000–2013
 

Fig. V.1.8 Numbers of exceedances of the limit value of O3 in the average for three years, agglomeration of Prague, 2006–2013
 

Fig. V.1.9 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, agglomeration of Prague, 2013
 

Fig. V.1.10 Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10, agglomeration of Prague, 2013
 

Fig. V.1.11 Emissions of selected pollutants listed according to REZZO in the agglomeration of Prague