AIR POLLUTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2004
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - Air Quality Protection Division



 LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. -1 Scheme of ISKOs links to data sources and co-operating systems 2004
Fig. 1.1 Total emissions of basic pollutants in the Czech Republic between 1990 and 2004
Fig. 1.2 Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2004
Fig. 1.3 Changes in residential heating in 2004 as compared to 1991
Fig. 1.4 Particulate emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003
Fig. 1.5 Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003
Fig. 1.6 Nitrogen oxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003
Fig. 1.7 CO emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003
Fig. 2.1.1 Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2004
Fig. 2.1.2 Monitoring of principal pollutants in selected organisations – development
Fig. 2.2.1 4th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average concentrations of SO2 in 1992–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.2 Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.3 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.4 Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.5 36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average concentrations of PM10 in 1994–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.6 Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.7 Field of annual average concentration of PM10 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.8 Stations with the highest exceedence of LV+MT for 24-hour concentrations of PM10 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.9 19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average concentrations of NO2 in 1992–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.10 Field of annual average concentration of NO2 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.11 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2 in 2004
Fig. 2.2.12 Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in 1992–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.13 7/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air at selected stations in 2004
Fig. 2.2.14 Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 1994–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.15 Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 2004
Fig. 2.2.16 Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the ambient air in 2004
Fig. 2.2.17 Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1999–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.18 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual benzene concentrations in 2004
Fig. 2.2.19 26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of ozone concentrations in three-year average, 1992–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.20 Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average of ozone concentration in three-year average, 2002–2004
Fig. 2.2.21 Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running average concentrations of ozone in 2002–2004
Fig. 2.2.22 Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in 1992–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.23 Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the ambient air in 2004
Fig. 2.2.24 1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air at selected stations in 2004
Fig. 2.2.25 Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in 1996–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.26 Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the ambient air in 2004
Fig. 2.2.27 1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air at selected stations in 2004
Fig. 2.2.28 Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in 1992–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.29 1/7/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air at selected stations in 2004
Fig. 2.2.30 Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 1997–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.31 Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the ambient air in 2004
Fig. 2.2.32 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2004
Fig. 2.2.33 Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2 and O3 annual characteristics in the Czech Republic, 1995–2004
Fig. 2.2.34 Trends of SO2, PM10 and NO2 annual characteristics in agglomerations, 1995–2004
Fig. 2.2.35 Areas/basic administrative units with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection limit values, ozone excluded, 2004
Fig. 2.2.36 Areas/basic administrative units with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection limit values incl. ozone, 2004
Fig. 2.2.37 Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1992/1993–2004/2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.38 Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2004/2004
Fig. 2.2.39 Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1992–2004 at selected stations
Fig. 2.2.40 Field of annual average concentration of NOx in 2004
Fig. 2.2.41 Exposure index AOT40 values in 1995–2004 at selected stations, average of 5 years
Fig. 2.2.42 Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average of 5 years, 2000–2004
Fig. 2.2.43 Stations with the highest AOT40 values in recent 5 years, 2000–2004
Fig. 2.2.44 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to SO2 and NOx limit values for the protection of ecosystems/vegetation, 2004
Fig. 2.2.45 Areas with deteriorated air quality for ecosystems/vegetation, exceedence of limit value incl. AOT40, 2004
Fig. 2.3.1 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.1.2004–29.2.2004
Fig. 2.3.2 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.11.2004–31.12.2004
Fig. 2.3.3 Course of maximum daily temperatures, their normal and daily total precipitation at Prague-Libuš station. Occurrence of ozone concentrations exceeding 180 μg.m-3 on the territory of the Czech Republic, 1.4.2004–30.9.2004
Fig. 2.3.4 Spatial distribution of maximum daily concentrations of ground-level ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 12 August 2004
Fig. 2.3.5 Spatial distribution of maximum daily concentrations of ground-level ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 4 September 2004
Fig. 3.1 Station networks monitoring precipitation quality and atmospheric deposition, 2004
Fig. 3.2 Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO4-S), 2004
Fig. 3.3 Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2-S), 2004
Fig. 3.4 Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2004
Fig. 3.5 Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2004
Fig. 3.6 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3-N), 2004
Fig. 3.7 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4-N), 2004
Fig. 3.8 Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2004
Fig. 3.9 Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx-N), 2004
Fig. 3.10 Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2004
Fig. 3.11 Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2004
Fig. 3.12 Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2004
Fig. 3.13 Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2004
Fig. 3.14 Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2004
Fig. 3.15 Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2004
Fig. 3.16 Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2004
Fig. 3.17 Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2004
Fig. 3.18 Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2004
Fig. 3.19 Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2004
Fig. 3.20 Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2004
Fig. 3.21 Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1991 and 2004, the Czech Republic
Fig. 3.22 Annual deposition of sulphur (SO4-S, SO2-S) and oxidated forms of nitrogen (NO3-N, NOx-N) in the Czech Republic, 1995–2004