Fig. -1 |
Scheme of ISKOs links to data sources and co-operating systems 2004 |
Fig. 1.1 |
Total emissions of basic pollutants in the Czech Republic
between 1990 and 2004 |
Fig. 1.2 |
Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2004 |
Fig. 1.3 |
Changes in residential heating in 2004 as compared to 1991 |
Fig. 1.4 |
Particulate emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003 |
Fig. 1.5 |
Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003 |
Fig. 1.6 |
Nitrogen oxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003 |
Fig. 1.7 |
CO emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2003 |
Fig. 2.1.1 |
Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2004 |
Fig. 2.1.2 |
Monitoring of principal pollutants in selected organisations – development |
Fig. 2.2.1 |
4th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average
concentrations of SO2 in 1992–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.2 |
Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.3 |
Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.4 |
Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.5 |
36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average
concentrations of PM10 in 1994–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.6 |
Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.7 |
Field of annual average concentration of PM10 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.8 |
Stations with the highest exceedence of LV+MT for 24-hour
concentrations of PM10 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.9 |
19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average
concentrations of NO2 in 1992–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.10 |
Field of annual average concentration of NO2 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.11 |
Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2 in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.12 |
Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in
1992–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.13 |
7/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air
at selected stations in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.14 |
Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in
1994–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.15 |
Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running
average concentrations of CO in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.16 |
Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the
ambient air in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.17 |
Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1999–2004 at
selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.18 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest
annual benzene concentrations in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.19 |
26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of
ozone concentrations in three-year average, 1992–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.20 |
Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running
average of ozone concentration in three-year average, 2002–2004 |
Fig. 2.2.21 |
Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour
running average concentrations of ozone in 2002–2004 |
Fig. 2.2.22 |
Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air
in 1992–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.23 |
Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the
ambient air in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.24 |
1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient
air at selected stations in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.25 |
Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air
in 1996–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.26 |
Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the
ambient air in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.27 |
1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient
air at selected stations in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.28 |
Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air
in 1992–2004 at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.29 |
1/7/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient
air at selected stations in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.30 |
Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 1997–2004
at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.31 |
Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in
the ambient air in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.32 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest
annual concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.33 |
Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2 and O3 annual characteristics in
the Czech Republic, 1995–2004 |
Fig. 2.2.34 |
Trends of SO2, PM10 and NO2 annual characteristics in
agglomerations, 1995–2004 |
Fig. 2.2.35 |
Areas/basic administrative units with deteriorated air
quality with regard to health protection limit values, ozone excluded,
2004 |
Fig. 2.2.36 |
Areas/basic administrative units with deteriorated air
quality with regard to health protection limit values incl. ozone, 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.37 |
Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1992/1993–2004/2004
at selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.38 |
Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2004/2004 |
Fig. 2.2.39 |
Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1992–2004 at
selected stations |
Fig. 2.2.40 |
Field of annual average concentration of NOx in 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.41 |
Exposure index AOT40 values in 1995–2004 at selected
stations, average of 5 years |
Fig. 2.2.42 |
Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average of 5 years, 2000–2004 |
Fig. 2.2.43 |
Stations with the highest AOT40 values in recent 5 years, 2000–2004 |
Fig. 2.2.44 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to SO2 and NOx limit values for the protection of ecosystems/vegetation, 2004 |
Fig. 2.2.45 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality for ecosystems/vegetation,
exceedence of limit value incl. AOT40, 2004 |
Fig. 2.3.1 |
Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova,
1.1.2004–29.2.2004 |
Fig. 2.3.2 |
Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova,
1.11.2004–31.12.2004 |
Fig. 2.3.3 |
Course of maximum daily temperatures, their normal and daily
total precipitation at Prague-Libuš station. Occurrence of ozone
concentrations exceeding 180 μg.m-3 on the territory of the Czech Republic,
1.4.2004–30.9.2004 |
Fig. 2.3.4 |
Spatial distribution of maximum daily concentrations of
ground-level ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 12 August 2004 |
Fig. 2.3.5 |
Spatial distribution of maximum daily concentrations of
ground-level ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 4 September
2004 |
Fig. 3.1 |
Station networks monitoring precipitation quality and
atmospheric deposition, 2004 |
Fig. 3.2 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO4-S), 2004 |
Fig. 3.3 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2-S), 2004 |
Fig. 3.4 |
Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2004 |
Fig. 3.5 |
Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2004 |
Fig. 3.6 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3-N), 2004 |
Fig. 3.7 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4-N), 2004 |
Fig. 3.8 |
Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2004 |
Fig. 3.9 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx-N), 2004 |
Fig. 3.10 |
Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2004 |
Fig. 3.11 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2004 |
Fig. 3.12 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions
corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2004 |
Fig. 3.13 |
Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2004 |
Fig. 3.14 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2004 |
Fig. 3.15 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2004 |
Fig. 3.16 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2004 |
Fig. 3.17 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2004 |
Fig. 3.18 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2004 |
Fig. 3.19 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2004 |
Fig. 3.20 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2004 |
Fig. 3.21 |
Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1991 and
2004, the Czech Republic |
Fig. 3.22 |
Annual deposition of sulphur (SO4-S, SO2-S) and oxidated
forms of nitrogen (NO3-N, NOx-N) in the Czech Republic, 1995–2004 |