AIR POLLUTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2006
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - Air Quality Protection Division




 LIST OF FIGURES
 
Fig. –1 Scheme of ISKO’s links to data sources and co-operating systems 2006
Fig. I.1 Total emissions of basic pollutants in the Czech Republic between 1990 and 2006
Fig. I.2 Changes in fuel structure in REZZO 1, 2005 as compared to 1990
Fig. I.3 Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2006
Fig. I.4 Changes in residential heating – comparison of 1991, 2000 and 2006
Fig. I.5 Changes in REZZO 3 emission quantities at constant structure of flats and fuels (100 % = average for 2001–2005)
Fig. I.6 Nitrogen oxides emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2005
Fig. I.7 Emission density of total suspended particles from 5x5 km squares, 2005
Fig. I.8 Lead emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005
Fig. I.9 Cadmium emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005
Fig. I.10 Mercury emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005
Fig. I.11 PCDD/F emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005
Fig. II.1.1 Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2006
Fig. II.1.2 Monitoring of basic pollutants in selected organisations – development
Fig. II.4.1.1 PM10 air pollution characteristics for monitoring stations and basic characteristics of meteorological conditions in the winter period (October–March) 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07, Prague agglomeration, 2006
Fig. II.4.1.2 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Prague agglomeration, 2006
Fig. II.4.1.3 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Prague agglomeration, 2006
Fig. II.4.1.4 24-hour PM10 concentrations and numbers of exceedances of limit value in winter period (October–March) 2005/06 and 2006/07
Fig. II.4.1.5 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Brno agglomeration, 2006
Fig. II.4.1.6 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Brno agglomeration, 2006
Fig. II.4.1.7 Interdependency between PM10 ambient air pollution and dispersion meteorological conditions
Fig. II.4.1.8 Average 24-hour PM10 concentrations, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 6.1.–15.1.2006
Fig. II.4.1.9 Comparison of maximum measured concentrations with air pollution limit values. 6.1.–6.1.2006
Fig. II.4.1.10 The level of air pollution caused by PM10 particles on the territory of the city of Ostrava in winter months 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07
Fig. II.4.1.11 Basic characteristics of meteorological conditions in winter months 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07
Fig. II.4.1.12 Air pollution characteristics of the stations in Ostrava in winter months 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07
Fig. II.4.1.13 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2006
Fig. II.4.1.14 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2006
Fig. II.4.1.15 Course of 24-hour concentrations of PM10, Ústí n.L.- Kočkov and Ústí n.L.-město, 2004–2006
Fig. II.4.1.16 Average 24-hour concentration of PM10, Ústí n.L.-Kočkov and Ústí n.L.-město, 8.1.–19.1.2006 and 22.1.–4.2.2006
Fig. II.4.1.17 Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2 and CO annual characteristics in agglomerations, 1996–2006
Fig. II.4.2.1 4th highest 24-hour concentrations and maximum hourly concentrations of SO2 in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.2 Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.3 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.4 Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.5 36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average concentrations of PM10 in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.6 Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.7 Field of annual average concentration of PM10 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.8 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for 24-hour concentrations of PM10 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.9 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for annual concentrations of PM10 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.10 Numbers of exceedances of air pollution limit value for the 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.11 Annual average PM10 concentrations at the stations with the exceedance of the limit value, 2002–2006
Fig. II.4.2.12 Annual average concentration of PM2.5 at stations in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.13 Average monthly PM2.5/PM10 proportions in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.14 Stations with the highest exceedance of the proposed LV for annual concentrations of PM2.5 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.15 19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average concentrations of NO2 in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.16 Field of annual average concentration of NO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.17 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.18 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV and LV+MT for annual concentrations of NO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.19 Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.20 Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.21 Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1999–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.22 Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the ambient air in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.23 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual benzene concentrations in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.24 26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations (three-year average) in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.25 Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentration in three-year average, 2004–2006
Fig. II.4.2.26 Numbers of exceedances of the target value for the maximum daily 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations in three-year average, 2004–2006
Fig. II.4.2.27 Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running average concentrations of ground-level ozone in 2004–2006
Fig. II.4.2.28 Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.29 1/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air at selected stations in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.30 Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.31 Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the ambient air in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.32 1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air at selected stations in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.33 Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.34 Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the ambient air in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.35 1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air at selected stations in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.36 Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.37 1/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air at selected stations in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.38 Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 1997–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.39 Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the ambient air in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.40 Month average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene at various types of localities, 2004–2006
Fig. II.4.2.41 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.42 Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2, NOx and O3 annual characteristics in the Czech Republic, 1996–2006
Fig. II.4.2.43 Annual average concentrations of SO2 in 1996–2006 at selected rural stations
Fig. II.4.2.44 Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1996/1997–2006/2007 at selected rural stations
Fig. II.4.2.45 Field of annual average concentration of SO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.46 Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2006/2007
Fig. II.4.2.47 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of SO2 in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.48 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest winter concentrations of SO2 in the winter period 2006/2007
Fig. II.4.2.49 Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1996–2006 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.50 Field of annual average concentration of NOx in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.51 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of NOx in 2006
Fig. II.4.2.52 Exposure index AOT40 values of ozone in 1996–2006 at selected stations, average for 5 years
Fig. II.4.2.53 Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average for 5 years, 2002–2006
Fig. II.4.2.54 Stations with the highest exposure index AOT40 values in recent 5 years, 2002–2006
Fig. II.4.2.55 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection limit values, 2006
Fig. II.4.2.56 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection target values, ground-level ozone excluded, 2006
Fig. II.4.2.57 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection target values, incl. ground-level ozone, 2006
Fig. II.5.1 Air temperature deviation from the long-term normal, Prague-Libuš, 1.1.–28.2.2006 and 1.11.–31.12.2006
Fig. II.5.2 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.10.2006–31.12.2006
Fig. II.5.3 Course of maximum daily temperatures, their normal and daily total precipitation at Prague-Libuš station. Occurrence of ozone concentrations exceeding 180 μg.m-3 on the territory of the Czech Republic, 1.4.2006–30.9.2006
Fig. II.5.4 Spatial distribution of maximum hourly concentrations of ground-level ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 21.7.2006
Fig. II.5.5 Spatial distribution of maximum hourly concentrations of ground-level ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 27.7.2006
Fig. II.6.1 POP monitoring, EMEP network, 2000
Fig. II.6.2 ΣPAH in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005
Fig. II.6.3 ΣPCB in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005
Fig. II.6.4 ΣHCH in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005
Fig. II.6.5 ΣDDT in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005
Fig. II.6.6 HCB and PeCB in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005
Fig. II.6.7 ΣPAH in precipitation water, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005
Fig. II.6.8 Time trends of POP concentrations in gaseous phase of the ambient air. The line represents the estimated trend
Fig. II.6.9 Time trends of POP concentrations in aerosol of the ambient air. The line represents the estimated trend
Fig. II.6.10 Time trends of POP concentrations in wet deposition. The line represents the estimated trend
Fig. II.6.11 ΣPAH concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians, 25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes)
Fig. II.6.12 ΣPCB concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians, 25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes)
Fig. II.6.13 ΣHCH concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians, 25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes)
Fig. II.6.14 ΣDDT concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians, 25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes)
Fig. II.6.15 ΣHCB concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians, 25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes)
Fig. III.1 Station networks monitoring atmospheric precipitation quality and atmospheric deposition, 2006
Fig. III.2 Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO42- - S), 2006
Fig. III.3 Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2 - S), 2006
Fig. III.4 Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2006
Fig. III.5 Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2006
Fig. III.6 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3- - N), 2006
Fig. III.7 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4+ - N), 2006
Fig. III.8 Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2006
Fig. III.9 Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx - N), 2006
Fig. III.10 Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2006
Fig. III.11 Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2006
Fig. III.12 Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2006
Fig. III.13 Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2006
Fig. III.14 Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2006
Fig. III.15 Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2006
Fig. III.16 Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2006
Fig. III.17 Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2006
Fig. III.18 Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2006
Fig. III.19 Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2006
Fig. III.20 Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2006
Fig. III.21 Annual deposition of sulphur (SO42-–S, SO2–S) and oxidated forms of nitrogen (NO3-–N, NOx–N) and hydrogen in the Czech Republic, 1995–2006
Fig. III.22 Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1991 and 2006, the Czech Republic

;