Fig. –1 |
Scheme of ISKO’s links to data sources and co-operating systems 2006 |
Fig. I.1 |
Total emissions of basic pollutants in the Czech Republic between
1990 and 2006 |
Fig. I.2 |
Changes in fuel structure in REZZO 1, 2005 as compared to 1990 |
Fig. I.3 |
Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2006
|
Fig. I.4 |
Changes in residential heating – comparison of 1991, 2000 and 2006 |
Fig. I.5 |
Changes in REZZO 3 emission quantities at constant structure of
flats and fuels (100 % = average for 2001–2005) |
Fig. I.6 |
Nitrogen oxides emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2005 |
Fig. I.7 |
Emission density of total suspended particles from 5x5 km squares,
2005 |
Fig. I.8 |
Lead emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005 |
Fig. I.9 |
Cadmium emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005 |
Fig. I.10 |
Mercury emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005 |
Fig. I.11 |
PCDD/F emissions from 5x5 km squares, 2005
|
Fig. II.1.1 |
Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2006 |
Fig. II.1.2 |
Monitoring of basic pollutants in selected organisations –
development
|
Fig. II.4.1.1 |
PM10 air pollution characteristics for monitoring stations and basic
characteristics of meteorological conditions in the winter period (October–March)
2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07, Prague agglomeration, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.2 |
Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Prague agglomeration, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.3 |
Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Prague
agglomeration, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.4 |
24-hour PM10 concentrations and numbers of exceedances of limit
value in winter period (October–March) 2005/06 and 2006/07 |
Fig. II.4.1.5 |
Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Brno agglomeration, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.6 |
Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Brno
agglomeration, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.7 |
Interdependency between PM10 ambient air pollution and dispersion
meteorological conditions |
Fig. II.4.1.8 |
Average 24-hour PM10 concentrations, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration,
6.1.–15.1.2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.9 |
Comparison of maximum measured concentrations with air pollution
limit values. 6.1.–6.1.2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.10 |
The level of air pollution caused by PM10 particles on the territory
of the city of Ostrava in winter months 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07 |
Fig. II.4.1.11 |
Basic characteristics of meteorological conditions in winter months
2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07 |
Fig. II.4.1.12 |
Air pollution characteristics of the stations in Ostrava in winter
months 2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07 |
Fig. II.4.1.13 |
Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Moravian-Silesian
agglomeration, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.14 |
Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Moravian-Silesian
agglomeration, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.15 |
Course of 24-hour concentrations of PM10, ĂšstĂ n.L.- KoÄŤkov and ĂšstĂ
n.L.-město, 2004–2006
|
Fig. II.4.1.16 |
Average 24-hour concentration of PM10, ĂšstĂ n.L.-KoÄŤkov and ĂšstĂ
n.L.-město, 8.1.–19.1.2006 and 22.1.–4.2.2006 |
Fig. II.4.1.17 |
Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2 and CO annual characteristics in
agglomerations, 1996–2006
|
Fig. II.4.2.1 |
4th highest 24-hour concentrations and maximum hourly concentrations
of SO2 in 1996–2006 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.2 |
Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.3 |
Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.4 |
Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.5 |
36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average
concentrations of PM10 in 1996–2006 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.6 |
Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.7 |
Field of annual average concentration of PM10 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.8 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for 24-hour
concentrations of PM10 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.9 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for annual concentrations
of PM10 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.10 |
Numbers of exceedances of air pollution limit value for the 24-hour
concentration of PM10 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.11 |
Annual average PM10 concentrations at the stations with the
exceedance of the limit value, 2002–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.12 |
Annual average concentration of PM2.5 at stations in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.13 |
Average monthly PM2.5/PM10 proportions in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.14 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of the proposed LV for annual
concentrations of PM2.5 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.15 |
19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average concentrations
of NO2 in 1996–2006 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.16 |
Field of annual average concentration of NO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.17 |
Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.18 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of LV and LV+MT for annual
concentrations of NO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.19 |
Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 1996–2006 at
selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.20 |
Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running average
concentrations of CO in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.21 |
Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1999–2006 at selected
stations |
Fig. II.4.2.22 |
Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the ambient air
in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.23 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
benzene concentrations in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.24 |
26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of ground-level
ozone concentrations (three-year average) in 1996–2006 at selected
stations |
Fig. II.4.2.25 |
Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average of
ground-level ozone concentration in three-year average, 2004–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.26 |
Numbers of exceedances of the target value for the maximum daily 8-hour
running average of ground-level ozone concentrations in three-year
average, 2004–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.27 |
Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running
average concentrations of ground-level ozone in 2004–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.28 |
Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in
1996–2006 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.29 |
1/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air at
selected stations in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.30 |
Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in
1996–2006 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.31 |
Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the ambient air
in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.32 |
1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air at
selected stations in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.33 |
Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in
1996–2006 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.34 |
Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the ambient air
in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.35 |
1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air at
selected stations in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.36 |
Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in
1996–2006 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.37 |
1/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air at
selected stations in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.38 |
Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 1997–2006 at
selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.39 |
Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the
ambient air in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.40 |
Month average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene at various types of
localities, 2004–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.41 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.42 |
Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2, NOx and O3 annual characteristics in the
Czech Republic, 1996–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.43 |
Annual average concentrations of SO2 in 1996–2006 at selected rural
stations |
Fig. II.4.2.44 |
Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1996/1997–2006/2007 at
selected rural stations |
Fig. II.4.2.45 |
Field of annual average concentration of SO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.46 |
Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2006/2007 |
Fig. II.4.2.47 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
concentrations of SO2 in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.48 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest winter
concentrations of SO2 in the winter period 2006/2007 |
Fig. II.4.2.49 |
Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1996–2006 at
selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.50 |
Field of annual average concentration of NOx in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.51 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
concentrations of NOx in 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.52 |
Exposure index AOT40 values of ozone in 1996–2006 at selected
stations, average for 5 years |
Fig. II.4.2.53 |
Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average for 5 years, 2002–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.54 |
Stations with the highest exposure index AOT40 values in recent 5
years, 2002–2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.55 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection
limit values, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.56 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection
target values, ground-level ozone excluded, 2006 |
Fig. II.4.2.57 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection
target values, incl. ground-level ozone, 2006 |
Fig. II.5.1 |
Air temperature deviation from the long-term normal, Prague-Libuš,
1.1.–28.2.2006 and 1.11.–31.12.2006 |
Fig. II.5.2 |
Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova,
1.10.2006–31.12.2006 |
Fig. II.5.3 |
Course of maximum daily temperatures, their normal and daily total
precipitation at Prague-Libuš station. Occurrence of ozone
concentrations exceeding 180 ÎĽg.m-3 on the territory of the Czech
Republic, 1.4.2006–30.9.2006 |
Fig. II.5.4 |
Spatial distribution of maximum hourly concentrations of ground-level
ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 21.7.2006 |
Fig. II.5.5 |
Spatial distribution of maximum hourly concentrations of ground-level
ozone on the territory of the Czech Republic, 27.7.2006 |
Fig. II.6.1 |
POP monitoring, EMEP network, 2000 |
Fig. II.6.2 |
ΣPAH in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005 |
Fig. II.6.3 |
ΣPCB in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005 |
Fig. II.6.4 |
ΣHCH in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005 |
Fig. II.6.5 |
ΣDDT in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005 |
Fig. II.6.6 |
HCB and PeCB in the ambient air, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005 |
Fig. II.6.7 |
ΣPAH in precipitation water, Košetice Observatory, 1996–2005 |
Fig. II.6.8 |
Time trends of POP concentrations in gaseous phase of the ambient
air. The line represents the estimated trend |
Fig. II.6.9 |
Time trends of POP concentrations in aerosol of the ambient air. The
line represents the estimated trend |
Fig. II.6.10 |
Time trends of POP concentrations in wet deposition. The line
represents the estimated trend |
Fig. II.6.11 |
ΣPAH concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians,
25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes) |
Fig. II.6.12 |
ΣPCB concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians,
25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes) |
Fig. II.6.13 |
ΣHCH concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians,
25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes) |
Fig. II.6.14 |
ΣDDT concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians,
25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes) |
Fig. II.6.15 |
ΣHCB concentrations in the ambient air, gaseous phase and aerosol, (medians,
25–75 %, non-outlier range, outliers and extremes) |
Fig. III.1 |
Station networks monitoring atmospheric precipitation quality and
atmospheric deposition, 2006 |
Fig. III.2 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO42-
- S), 2006 |
Fig. III.3 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2 - S), 2006 |
Fig. III.4 |
Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2006 |
Fig. III.5 |
Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2006 |
Fig. III.6 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3-
- N), 2006 |
Fig. III.7 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4+
- N), 2006 |
Fig. III.8 |
Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2006 |
Fig. III.9 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx - N), 2006 |
Fig. III.10 |
Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2006 |
Fig. III.11 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2006 |
Fig. III.12 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to
SO2 and NOx deposition, 2006 |
Fig. III.13 |
Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2006 |
Fig. III.14 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2006 |
Fig. III.15 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2006 |
Fig. III.16 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2006 |
Fig. III.17 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2006 |
Fig. III.18 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2006 |
Fig. III.19 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2006 |
Fig. III.20 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2006 |
Fig. III.21 |
Annual deposition of sulphur (SO42-–S, SO2–S) and oxidated forms of
nitrogen (NO3-–N, NOx–N) and hydrogen in the Czech Republic, 1995–2006 |
Fig. III.22 |
Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1991 and 2006,
the Czech Republic |