Chemical composition (precipitation quality) and atmospheric deposition have
been monitored in the long term at relatively large number of stations in the
Czech Republic. In 2007 the Air Quality Information System (ISKO/AQIS) database
obtained data on precipitation quality from 54 localities in total (16 ÄŚGS, 15
CHMI, 14 VĂšLHM, 3 VĂšV TGM and 6 HBĂš AV ÄŚR, see
Fig. III.1). Further, data from 6 Polish and 5 German boundary areas were
submitted. Most of the CHMI stations measure wet-only samples in weekly interval
(monthly interval was switched over to weekly interval in 1996 in line with the
EMEP methodology). In 1997 the weekly precipitation sampling, “bulk” type, (with
non-specified contains of dustfall) for heavy metals analysis was introduced at
these stations. In the localities of other organizations monthly sampling (or
irregular sampling) is used for measuring concentrations in precipitation (“bulk”type)
in the open area (or throughfall). The detailed information on individual
localities and sampling types is presented in Table
III.4.
Tables III.5 and III.6
contain average values of the chemical composition of atmospheric precipitation
and the values of the 2007 annual wet deposition.
Wet deposition charts were compiled for selected ions on the basis of all-round
chemical analyses of wet only precipitation samples, specifically for SO42-
- S, NO3-- N, NG4+- N, H+
(pH), F- and Cl -, and the maps of wet deposition with an
undefineable amount of dry deposition (“bulk” sampling) for Pb, Cd and Ni were
also created.
The above ions were selected to represent deposition fields with regard to their
considerable impact on the various spheres of the environment. Wet deposition
charts for each of the ions were derived from the field of ion concentrations in
precipitation (based on annual mean concentrations weighted by precipitation
totals calculated from the data observed), and from the field of annual
precipitation totals which was generated on data from 750 precipitation gauging
stations, taking into account the altitude’s effect on precipitation amount.
When constructing wet deposition fields, results of wet-only samples analysis
are preferred to “bulk” samples with dustfall, and weekly samples are preferred
to monthly samples. Data from the network stations operated by ÄŚGS, VĂšV TGM and
VĂšLHM based on monthly “bulk” sampling with dustfall (see
Table III.4) are modified by empirical coefficients
expressing the individual ions’ ratios in “wet-only” and “bulk” samples (values
for each of the ions from 0.74 for NH4+ to 1.06 for H+)
for the purpose of the development of the wet deposition charts. The fact that
in case of H+ cations the ratio is higher than 1, can be explained in the
following way: the solid particles contained in the “bulk” type samples react
with hydrogen cations, which results in their decreasing concentration [31].
In addition to wet deposition, also dry and total deposition charts are included
for sulphur, nitrogen and hydrogen ions. Dry sulphur and nitrogen deposition was
calculated using fields of annual mean SO2 and NOx
concentrations for the Czech Republic, and the deposition rates found in [21]
for SO2 0.7 cm.s-1/0.35 cm.s-1, and NOx
0.4 cm.s-1 / 0.1 cm.s-1, in case of forested/unforested
area. Total deposition charts were produced by adding S and N wet and dry
deposition charts. The wet hydrogen ion deposition chart was compiled on the
base of pH values measured in precipitation. Dry hydrogen ion deposition
reflects SO2 and NOx deposition based on stechiometry,
assuming their acid reaction in the environment. The total hydrogen ion
deposition chart was developed by summation of wet and dry deposition charts.
The average deposition fluxes of S, N and H are presented in the
table III.1.
Tab. III.1 Average deposition fluxes of S, N and H in
the Czech Republic, 2007
Throughfall sulphur deposition chart was generated for forested areas from
the field of sulphur concentrations in throughfall and a verified field of
precipitation, which was modified by a percentage of precipitation amounts
measured under canopy at each station (47–114 % of precipitation totals for the
year 2007). In 2007 the map was created with the use of a new, more detailed
layer of forests, with the total area amounting to 22 000 km2.
Throughfall deposition generally includes wet vertical and horizontal deposition
(from fogs, low clouds and rime) and dry deposition of particles and gases in
forests. In case of sulphur, its circulation within the forests is negligible;
it should provide a good estimate of total deposition.
The maps of heavy metals wet deposition (with an undefineable amount of dry
deposition) for Pb, Cd and Ni were derived from concentrations of these metals
in “bulk” precipitation samples with dustfall at individual stations. The fields
of dry deposition of Pb and Cd contained in SPM (dry Pb and Cd deposition) were
derived from the fields of these metals’ concentrations in the ambient air (or
on the basis of air pollution field of annual average of PM10
concentrations and values of IDW interpolation of the shares of the respective
metal in dust). The deposition rate of Cd contained in SPM was taken as 0.27
cm.s-1 for a forest and 0.1 cm.s-1 for unforested terrain;
the figures for Pb are 0.25 cm.s-1 for a forest and 0.08 cm.s-1
for unforested terrain [21].
The data on precipitation quality are controlled routinely using the method of
ion balance calculation (the difference between the sum of cations and the sum
of anions in the sample should meet the allowable criteria which differ slightly
in various organizations).
Another control is carried out by comparing the calculated conductivity and the
measured conductivity which both should also meet the allowable criteria.
Analysis of the blank laboratory samples is also used and blank field samples
are monitored and assessed continuously. This enables the control of work during
sampling and the control of changes occurring due to transport, manipulation,
storage and preparation of the samples prior to the chemical analysis.
Results
- The precipitation in the year 2007 for the territory of the Czech
Republic was above the long-term normal; it amounted to 755 mm in the
average, which represents 112 % of the long-term normal (for the years
1961–1990). As compared with the year 2006 the total precipitation was
slightly higher (by 47 mm).
- Wet sulphur deposition decreased after 1997 below 50,000 t and this
trend continued up to 1999. Since 2000 the profound decrease had not
continued and the values remain more or less at the level of 1999 with the
exception of lower depositions in 2003, where the precipitation total was
markedly subnormal. The highest values of sulphur wet deposition were
recorded in the Jizerské hory Mts. and in the Krkonoše Mts.
Dry sulphur deposition the most significant decline of which was recorded in
the year 1998 (the value decreased by 45 % in comparison with the average
value for the period 1995–1997), continued to decline in 1999–2000. In
2000–2006 the deposition field remained at the same level, which is coherent
with SO2 concentrations in the ground-level ambient air. In 2007
the dry sulphur deposition recorded a marked decrease, resulting from the
reduction of air pollution concentrations due to more favourable
meteorological and dispersion conditions. The field of total sulphur
deposition is the sum of wet and dry depositions and it shows the total
sulphur deposition amounting to 52,043 t for the Czech Republic's territory
for the year 2007 (see Table III.2). The
decrease of the total deposition was caused by the decrease of dry sulphur
deposition. After the previous decrease from the values markedly above
100,000 t, in 2000–2006 the sulphur deposition remained within the range
from 65,000 to 75,000 t per year with the exception of the year 2003 which
was markedly below normal as for the precipitation (see
Fig. III.21). The value of total
deposition in 2007 almost reached the value of the year 2003. The total
sulphur deposition reached the maximum values in the Krušné hory Mts. area.
- The throughfall sulphur deposition field reached the maximum values in
the Krušné hory Mts. and in the Orlické hory Mts. In some parts of the
mountains in the Czech Republic the values of throughfall deposition reach,
in the long-term, higher values than the values of the total sulphur
deposition determined as the sum of wet (only vertical) and dry deposition
from SO2. The increased contribution can be attributed to
deposition from fog, low clouds and rime (horizontal deposition) which is
not included in total summary deposition because of uncertainties. Hoarfrost
and fog are normally highly concentrated and may significantly contribute to
sulphur and other elements’ deposition in mountainous areas and areas with
frequent fogs (valley fogs, fogs near water courses and lakes). The problem
is in a very erratic character of this type of deposition from place to
place where some uncertainties may occur when extrapolating to a wider area.
For sulphates, the deposition from fogs and rime in the mountain areas is
stated in the range 50–90 % of the “bulk” type deposition in the average for
a longer period (several years) [32, 33]. In some individually assessed
years the relation of the sulphates deposition from fog and rime and “bulk“
type deposition exceeded even 100 %.
Further, the throughfall deposition includes also the contribution from dry
deposition of S from SO42- of suspended particles.
Based on the data on sulphates concentration in aerosol for the year 2007
from two stations (Prague 4-Libuš, Svratouch) and on the application of the
deposition rate 0.25 cm.s-1 [21] dry deposition of S from SO42-
reached the average value of 0.1 g.m-2.year-1 for
forest areas. Due to the fact that sulphates concentration in aerosol was
available only from two localities in 2007, this is a very rough estimate.
Nevertheles, it is apparent that with regard to the values of throughfall
deposition or total deposition of S the contribution of S from SO42-
in suspended particles is negligible.
The map of throughfall deposition can be regarded as an illustration what
values the total sulphur deposition (including the horizontal deposition and
dry deposition of S from SO42-.of suspended particles)
can reach, because in sulphur, unlike other pollutants, the inner
circulation in vegetation is negligible. In 2007 the new, more detailed
layer of forests achieving 22,000 km2 was used for the
calculation of throughfall deposition. Therefore, also total values of
througfall deposition since 2001 were recalculated with the use of the new
layer of forests, in order to carry out the comparison with the year 2007
(see Table III.3). Throughfall sulphur
deposition on the forested surface of the Czech Republic reached the amount
of 23,662 t in 2007.
- The map of wet deposition of nitrates and ammonia ions shows the highest
values in the territory of the Krkonoše Mts. (locality HĹ™ĂbÄ›cĂ). Higher
values of wet deposition of nitrates, connected mainly with higher total
precipitation, were recorded in the mountainous areas, and namely in the
Jizerské hory Mts., in the Krušné hory Mts., in the Orlické hory Mts., in
the HrubĂ˝ JesenĂk Mts. and in the Ĺ umava Mts. Higher values of wet
deposition of ammonia ions were recorded in the the Krušné hory Mts., in the
OrlickĂ© hory Mts., in the HrubĂ˝ JesenĂk Mts., in the Ĺ umava Mts., in the
Český les Mts. and in the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts. The total wet
deposition of the oxidized forms of nitrogen in the territory of the Czech
Republic decreased, as compared to the previous years, mainly due to the
decrease of dry NOx deposition caused by more favourable meteorological and
dispersion conditions (see Fig. III.21).
Dry deposition of oxidized forms of nitrogen was declining up to the year
2002 (when the value reached 48 % of the value of the average for the years
1995–1997). Afterwards, a certain stagnation was recorded, the value of
deposition for the Czech Republic ranged between 14,105 t and 20,622 t. The
lowest value (14,205 t) was reached in the year 2007.
In 2007 the total nitrogen deposition reached 70,611 t of N (ox+red). year-1
for the area of the Czech Republic (see Table III.2),
which represents a significant decrease in comparison with the previous
years. The highest values of total nitrogen deposition were reached in the
Krkonoše Mts. (locality HĹ™ĂbÄ›cĂ) and in the LuĹľickĂ© hory Mts., the OrlickĂ©
hory Mts., the KrušnĂ© hory Mts. and in the HrubĂ˝ JesenĂk Mts.
- The wet deposition of hydrogen ions reached the maximum values in the
Krkonoše Mts. (localities HĹ™ĂbÄ›cĂ and ModrĂ˝ potok), the JizerskĂ© hory Mts.,
the Krušné hory Mts. and the Šumava Mts. The map of dry deposition of
hydrogen ions shows the decrease of its values. In the second half of the
90’s of the last century both wet and dry depositions of hydrogen ions
decreased by 50 % per the whole area of the Czech Republic, the decrease of
dry deposition of hydrogen ions values was in coherence with the decrease of
dry deposition of SO2–S and NOx–N.
Fig. III. 21 shows an apparent
decrease of dry deposition of hydrogen ions in 2007 in coherence with the
decrease of SO2 and NOx deposition.
- After the year 2000 when the distribution of leaded petrol was finished
the values of wet deposition of lead ions markedly decreased. The field of
wet deposition for the year 2007 is in the majority of the territory of the
Czech Republic similar as in the years 2004 and 2005. The maximum deposition
was recorded in the territory of the Jizerské hory Mts. More significant
increase of deposition above 10 mg.m-2.year-1 in 2006
in the Jizerské hory Mrs., the Orlické hory Mts. and the Žďárské vrchy Mts.
was not confirmed. The map of dry lead deposition is similar as in the
previous years.
- The wet deposition of cadmium in 2007 did not reach such marked increase
in the area of the Jizerské hory Mts. as in the previous years. The values
decreased below 0.25 mg.m-2.year-1. A slight decrease
(below 0.5 mg.m-2.year-1) was recorded already in
2006. On the contrary, the values of dry deposition of cadmium ions were
higher as compared with the remaining part of the Czech Republic, similarly
as in the previous years, in the Liberec Region, which was caused by local
pollution. Long-term increased cadmium concentrations in the ambient air are
also measured in this area. Significant emission source from the glassworks
is one of the probable reasons of this situation.
- The 2007 map of wet annual deposition of nickel ions did not confirm the
increase of deposition from the year 2006 in the area of the Jizerské hory
Mts. and the Krkonoše Mts. The maximum values (1.5–2 mg.m-2.year-1)
were reached in the locality Hradec Králové-observatoř and in the Krkonoše
Mts., near the locality HĹ™ĂbÄ›cĂ.
- The highest values of the deposition of fluoride ions were recorded in
the Jizerské hory Mts. The maximum levels of wet deposition of chloride ions
were recorded in the Krkonoše Mts. and in the Jizerské hory Mts.
The development of annual wet deposition of the main elements as measured at
selected stations in the Czech Republic (Fig.
III.23) shows stagnation instead. The decrease of sulphate deposition
was substantial not only at the exposed stations as Ústà n.L., Prague-Libuš
or Hradec Králové but it was also obvious at the background stations
Košetice and Svratouch. The decrease was substantial at the station Ústà n.L.
where the wet sulphate deposition decreased by 60 % after 1995 and where the
decrease of other substances (NO3-, NH4+,
Pb2+) was also obvious.
With the development of sulphur and nitrogen deposition the development of
the proportion of both elements can be observed in atmospheric precipitation
connected with the development of emissions of individual pollutants. Since
the second half of the 90’s a slight increase of nitrates and sulphates
proportion has been observed. The development of this proportion over the
recent 10 years for the CHMI stations is shown in
Fig. III.22.
Tab. III.1 Average deposition fluxes of S, N and H in the Czech Republic,
2007
Tab. III.2 Estimate of the total annual deposition of the given elements in
the Czech Republic (78,841 sq. km) in tonnes, 2007
Tab. III.3 Estimate of the total annual deposition of sulphur on the forested
part of the Czech Republic (22,000 sq. km) in tonnes, 2001–2007
Tab. III.4 Station networks of
precipitation and atmospheric deposition, 2007
Tab. III.5 Mean annual concentrations of ions in atmospheric precipitation at stations in the Czech Republic, 2007
Tab. III.6 Annual wet atmospheric deposition at
stations in the Czech Republic, 2007
Fig. III.1 Station networks monitoring atmospheric precipitation quality and
atmospheric deposition, 2007
Fig. III.2 Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO42-
- S), 2007
Fig. III.3 Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2 - S),
2007
Fig. III.4 Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2007
Fig. III.5 Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2007
Fig. III.6 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3-
- N), 2007
Fig. III.7 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4+
- N), 2007
Fig. III.8 Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2007
Fig. III.9 Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx - N),
2007
Fig. III.10 Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2007
Fig. III.11 Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2007
Fig. III.12 Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to
SO2 and NOx deposition, 2007
Fig. III.13 Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2007
Fig. III.14 Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2007
Fig. III.15 Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2007
Fig. III.16 Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2007
Fig. III.17 Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2007
Fig. III.18 Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2007
Fig. III.19 Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2007
Fig. III.20 Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2007
Fig. III.21 Annual deposition of sulphur (SO42–S, SO2–S)
and oxidated forms of nitrogen (NO3-–N, NOx–N)
and hydrogen in the Czech Republic, 1995–2007
Fig. III.22 The development of the ratio of nitrate/sulphate concentrations in
atmospheric deposition (expressed as ÎĽeq.-l ) at the CHMI stations,
1998–2007
Fig. III.23 Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1991 and 2007, the Czech Republic