Fig. -1
|
Scheme of ISKOs links to data sources and co-operating
systems
|
Fig. 1-1
|
Total emissions of principal pollutants in the Czech
Republic between 1988 and 2000
|
Fig. 1-2
|
Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1990–2000
|
Fig. 1-3
|
Changes in residential heating in 2000 as compared to 1991
|
Fig. 1-4
|
Particulate emission density from 5x5 km squares, 1999
|
Fig. 1-5
|
Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 1999
|
Fig. 1-6
|
Nitrogen oxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 1999
|
Fig. 1-7
|
CxHy emission density from 5x5 km
squares, 1999
|
Fig. 1-8
|
Annual emissions of principal pollutants from REZZO 1
stationary sources between 1990 and 2000 in Prague
|
Fig. 1-9
|
Annual emissions of principal pollutants from REZZO 1
stationary sources between 1990 and 2000 in North Bohemia
|
Fig. 1-10
|
Annual emissions of principal pollutants from REZZO 1
stationary sources between 1990 and 2000 in North Moravia
|
Fig. 2-1
|
Monitoring of principal pollutants in selected
organisations - development
|
Fig. 2-2
|
Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring,
2000
|
Fig. 2-3
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Prague 2000
|
Fig. 2-4
|
Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Prague 2000
|
Fig. 2-5
|
Annual arithmetic means of concentrations measured and
recalculated values at stations, SPM, Prague 2000
|
Fig. 2-6
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM,
Prague 2000
|
Fig. 2-7
|
90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10,
Prague 2000
|
Fig. 2-8
|
Annual arithmetic means of concentrationsat stations,
nitrogen oxides, Prague 2000
|
Fig. 2-9
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, Prague 2000
|
Fig. 2-10
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal
pollutants at selected stations, Prague – part 1, 2000
|
Fig. 2-11
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal
pollutants at selected stations, Prague – part 2, 2000
|
Fig. 2-12
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Central
Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-13
|
Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Central
Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-14
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with
presentation of measured and recalculated values at stations, SPM, Central
Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-15
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM,
Central Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-16
|
90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10,
Central Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-17
|
Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, Central Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-18
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, Central Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-19
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal
pollutants at selected stations, Central Bohemian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-20
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Northwest
Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-21
|
Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Northwest
Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-22
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with
presentation of measured and recalculated values at stations, SPM,
Northwest Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-23
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM,
Northwest Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-24
|
90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10,
Northwest Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-25
|
Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, Northwest Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-26
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, Northwest Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-27
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal
pollutants for selected stations, Northwest Region – part 1, 2000
|
Fig. 2-28
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal
pollutants for selected stations, Northwest Region – part 2, 2000
|
Fig. 2-29
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide,
Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-30
|
Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with
presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide,
Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-31
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with
presentation of measured and recalculated values at stations, SPM,
Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-32
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM,
Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-33
|
90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10,
Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-34
|
Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-35
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-36
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal
pollutants for selected stations, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000
|
Fig. 2-37
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations,
sulphur dioxide, 2000
|
Fig. 2-38
|
Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations,
sulphur dioxide, 2000
|
Fig. 2-39
|
Relative frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit
value at stations, sulphur dioxide, 2000
|
Fig. 2-40
|
Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations, SPM,
2000
|
Fig. 2-41
|
Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations, PM10,
2000
|
Fig. 2-42
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM,
2000
|
Fig. 2-43
|
90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10,
2000
|
Fig. 2-44
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations, SPM,
2000
|
Fig. 2-45
|
Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations, SPM,
2000
|
Fig. 2-46
|
Relative frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit
value at stations, SPM, 2000
|
Fig. 2-47
|
Absolute frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit
value at stations, PM10, 2000
|
Fig. 2-48
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations,
nitrogen oxides, 2000
|
Fig. 2-49
|
95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations,
nitrogen oxides, 2000
|
Fig. 2-50
|
Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations,
nitrogen oxides, 2000
|
Fig. 2-51
|
Relative frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit
value at stations, nitrogen oxides, 2000
|
Fig. 2-52
|
Principal ambient air pollution characteristics - annual
arithmetic means and 95th percentiles of daily average sulphur dioxide
concentrations, by districts, between 1990 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-53
|
Principal ambient air pollution characteristics - annual
arithmetic means and 95th percentiles of daily average SPM concentrations,
by districts, between 1990 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-54
|
Principal ambient air pollution characteristics - annual
arithmetic means and 95th percentiles of daily average nitrogen oxide
concentrations, by districts, between 1990 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-55
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal
pollutants for selected stations, the Czech Republic 2000
|
Fig. 2-56
|
Annual assessment for 1982–2000 in Prague, Northwest
Region and Moravian-Silesian Region
|
Fig. 2-57
|
Assessment of 1982/1983–2000/2000 winter seasons in
Prague, Northwest Region and Moravian-Silesian Region
|
Fig. 2-58
|
Carbon monoxide monitoring network, 2000
|
Fig. 2-59
|
Average daily course of CO concentrations at urban and
rural stations, the Czech Republic, winter 2000
|
Fig. 2-60
|
Average daily course of CO concentrations at urban and
rural stations, the Czech Republic, summer 2000
|
Fig. 2-61
|
Ground-level ozone monitoring network, 2000
|
Fig. 2-62
|
Course of daily O3, NO and NO2
concentrations at urban stations between 15 March and 15 October 2000
|
Fig. 2-63
|
Course of daily O3, NO and NO2
concentrations at rural and mountain stations between 15 March and 15
October 2000
|
Fig. 2-64
|
Number of hours exceeding the ozone alert threshold of 180
μg.m-3, the Czech Republic 2000
|
Fig. 2-65
|
Number of stations exceeding the ozone alert threshold of
180 μg.m-3, the Czech Republic 2000
|
Fig. 2-66
|
Number of stations exceeding the ozone 8-hour limit value
of 160 μg.m-3, the Czech Republic 2000
|
Fig. 2-67
|
Maximum measured hourly and 8-hour ozone concentrations
and exceedence of ozone alert threshold (180 μg.m-3) and ozone
8-hour limit value (160 μg.m-3), 2000
|
Fig. 2-68
|
Fields of AOT40 ozone exposure index for forests, 2000
|
Fig. 2-69
|
Fields of AOT40 ozone exposure index for farm crops, 2000
|
Fig. 2-70
|
Weekly course of benzene concentrations, Libuš and Smíchov
stations, 2000
|
Fig. 2-71
|
Course of half-hour benzene concentrations on working
days, Saturdays and Sundays in winter and summer periods, Libuš and Smíchov
stations, 2000
|
Fig. 2-72
|
Annual courses of daily concentrations of aromatic
hydrocarbons BTX, 2000
|
Fig. 2-73
|
Annual mean concentrations of arsenic in the atmosphere at
selected stations between 1989 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-74
|
Annual mean concentrations of cadmium in the atmosphere at
selected stations between 1989 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-75
|
Annual mean concentrations of lead in the atmosphere at
selected stations between 1989 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-76
|
Estimate of cadmium concentration fields with presentation
of measured values at stations, 2000
|
Fig. 2-77
|
Estimate of lead concentration fields with presentation of
measured values at stations, 2000
|
Fig. 2-78
|
PAHs in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000, month averages
|
Fig. 2-79
|
PAHs in ambient air, Košetice 1990–2000, month averages
– seasonal variation
|
Fig. 2-80
|
PCBs in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000 Fig. 2-81 alfa
-HCH and gama -HCH in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000
|
Fig. 2-81 |
alfa-HCH and gama-HCH in ambient air, Košetice 1996-2000 |
Fig. 2-82
|
Hexachlorobenzene in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000
|
Fig. 2-83
|
PCBs in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000, month averages
– seasonal variation
|
Fig. 2-84
|
alfa -HCH and gama -HCH in ambient air, Košetice
1996–1999, month averages – seasonal variation
|
Fig. 2-85
|
Sum of p,p-DDE, p,p-DDD and p,p-DDT in ambient
air, Košetice 1996–2000, month averages – seasonal variation
|
Fig. 2-86
|
Hexachlorobenzene in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000,
month averages – seasonal variation
|
Fig. 2-87
|
PAHs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999
|
Fig. 2-88
|
PAHs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999, month
averages
|
Fig. 2-89
|
PCBs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999
|
Fig. 2-90
|
PCBs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999, month
averages
|
Fig. 2-91
|
HCH isomers in precipitation, Košetice 1997–1999
|
Fig. 2-92
|
p,p-DDE, p,p-DDD and p,p-DDT in precipitation
water, Košetice 1997–1999
|
Fig. 2-93
|
Hexachlorbenzene in precipitation water, Košetice
1997–1999
|
Fig. 2-94
|
Annual courses of concentrations of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs), 2000
|
Fig. 2-95
|
The development of population and area proportions in air
quality classes
|
Fig. 2-96
|
Classification of the Czech Republics territory in
terms of air quality summary assessment, 2000
|
Fig. 2-97
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations,
sulphur dioxide, 1990 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-98
|
Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations, SPM,
1990 and 2000
|
Fig. 2-99
|
Time-height cross-section of air temperature and of
temperature gradients
|
Fig. 2-100
|
Area distribution of maximum average hourly concentrations
of ground-level ozone during the ozone episode
|
Fig. 2-101
|
1-hour moving averages at selected urban stations, summer
smog episode, the Czech Republic, 18.–23. 6. 2000, O3
|
Fig. 2-102
|
1-hour moving averages at selected rural stations, summer
smog episode, the Czech Republic, 18.–23. 6. 2000, O3
|
Fig. 3-1
|
Station networks monitoring precipitation quality and
atmospheric deposition, 2000
|
Fig. 3-2
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO2-4
- S), 2000
|
Fig. 3-3
|
Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2
- S), 2000
|
Fig. 3-4
|
Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2000
|
Fig. 3-5
|
Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2000
|
Fig. 3-6
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO-3
- N), 2000
|
Fig. 3-7
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH+4
- N), 2000
|
Fig. 3-8
|
Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2000
|
Fig. 3-9
|
Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx
- N), 2000
|
Fig. 3-10
|
Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2000
|
Fig. 3-11
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2000
|
Fig. 3-12
|
Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions
corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2000
|
Fig. 3-13
|
Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2000
|
Fig. 3-14
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2000
|
Fig. 3-15
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2000
|
Fig. 3-16
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2000
|
Fig. 3-17
|
Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2000
|
Fig. 3-18
|
Fields of annual throughfall deposition of lead, 2000
|
Fig. 3-19
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2000
|
Fig. 3-20
|
Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2000
|
Fig. 3-21
|
Fields of annual throughfall deposition of cadmium, 2000
|
Fig. 3-22
|
Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2000
|
Fig. 3-23
|
Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1990
and 2000, the Czech Republic
|