AIT POLLUTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2000

Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - Air Quality Protection Division




LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. -1

Scheme of ISKOs links to data sources and co-operating systems

Fig. 1-1

Total emissions of principal pollutants in the Czech Republic between 1988 and 2000

Fig. 1-2

Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1990–2000

Fig. 1-3

Changes in residential heating in 2000 as compared to 1991

Fig. 1-4

Particulate emission density from 5x5 km squares, 1999

Fig. 1-5

Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 1999

Fig. 1-6

Nitrogen oxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 1999

Fig. 1-7

CxHy emission density from 5x5 km squares, 1999

Fig. 1-8

Annual emissions of principal pollutants from REZZO 1 stationary sources between 1990 and 2000 in Prague

Fig. 1-9

Annual emissions of principal pollutants from REZZO 1 stationary sources between 1990 and 2000 in North Bohemia

Fig. 1-10

Annual emissions of principal pollutants from REZZO 1 stationary sources between 1990 and 2000 in North Moravia

Fig. 2-1

Monitoring of principal pollutants in selected organisations - development

Fig. 2-2

Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2000

Fig. 2-3

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Prague 2000

Fig. 2-4

Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Prague 2000

Fig. 2-5

Annual arithmetic means of concentrations measured and recalculated values at stations, SPM, Prague 2000

Fig. 2-6

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM, Prague 2000

Fig. 2-7

90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10, Prague 2000

Fig. 2-8

Annual arithmetic means of concentrationsat stations, nitrogen oxides, Prague 2000

Fig. 2-9

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, Prague 2000

Fig. 2-10

Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal pollutants at selected stations, Prague – part 1, 2000

Fig. 2-11

Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal pollutants at selected stations, Prague – part 2, 2000

Fig. 2-12

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-13

Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-14

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with presentation of measured and recalculated values at stations, SPM, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-15

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-16

90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-17

Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-18

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-19

Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal pollutants at selected stations, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Fig. 2-20

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Northwest Region 2000

Fig. 2-21

Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Northwest Region 2000

Fig. 2-22

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with presentation of measured and recalculated values at stations, SPM, Northwest Region 2000

Fig. 2-23

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM, Northwest Region 2000

Fig. 2-24

90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10, Northwest Region 2000

Fig. 2-25

Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, Northwest Region 2000

Fig. 2-26

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, Northwest Region 2000

Fig. 2-27

Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal pollutants for selected stations, Northwest Region – part 1, 2000

Fig. 2-28

Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal pollutants for selected stations, Northwest Region – part 2, 2000

Fig. 2-29

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-30

Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations with presentation of measured values at stations, sulphur dioxide, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-31

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations with presentation of measured and recalculated values at stations, SPM, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-32

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-33

90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-34

Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-35

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-36

Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal pollutants for selected stations, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Fig. 2-37

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations, sulphur dioxide, 2000

Fig. 2-38

Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations, sulphur dioxide, 2000

Fig. 2-39

Relative frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit value at stations, sulphur dioxide, 2000

Fig. 2-40

Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations, SPM, 2000

Fig. 2-41

Annual arithmetic means of concentrations at stations, PM10, 2000

Fig. 2-42

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, SPM, 2000

Fig. 2-43

90th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, PM10, 2000

Fig. 2-44

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations, SPM, 2000

Fig. 2-45

Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations, SPM, 2000

Fig. 2-46

Relative frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit value at stations, SPM, 2000

Fig. 2-47

Absolute frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit value at stations, PM10, 2000

Fig. 2-48

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations, nitrogen oxides, 2000

Fig. 2-49

95th percentiles of daily concentrations at stations, nitrogen oxides, 2000

Fig. 2-50

Fields of 95th percentiles of daily concentrations, nitrogen oxides, 2000

Fig. 2-51

Relative frequency of exceeding IHd daily limit value at stations, nitrogen oxides, 2000

Fig. 2-52

Principal ambient air pollution characteristics - annual arithmetic means and 95th percentiles of daily average sulphur dioxide concentrations, by districts, between 1990 and 2000

Fig. 2-53

Principal ambient air pollution characteristics - annual arithmetic means and 95th percentiles of daily average SPM concentrations, by districts, between 1990 and 2000

Fig. 2-54

Principal ambient air pollution characteristics - annual arithmetic means and 95th percentiles of daily average nitrogen oxide concentrations, by districts, between 1990 and 2000

Fig. 2-55

Annual courses of daily concentrations of principal pollutants for selected stations, the Czech Republic 2000

Fig. 2-56

Annual assessment for 1982–2000 in Prague, Northwest Region and Moravian-Silesian Region

Fig. 2-57

Assessment of 1982/1983–2000/2000 winter seasons in Prague, Northwest Region and Moravian-Silesian Region

Fig. 2-58

Carbon monoxide monitoring network, 2000 

Fig. 2-59

Average daily course of CO concentrations at urban and rural stations, the Czech Republic, winter 2000 

Fig. 2-60

Average daily course of CO concentrations at urban and rural stations, the Czech Republic, summer 2000

Fig. 2-61

Ground-level ozone monitoring network, 2000 

Fig. 2-62

Course of daily O3, NO and NO2 concentrations at urban stations between 15 March and 15 October 2000

Fig. 2-63

Course of daily O3, NO and NO2 concentrations at rural and mountain stations between 15 March and 15 October 2000

Fig. 2-64

Number of hours exceeding the ozone alert threshold of 180 μg.m-3, the Czech Republic 2000

Fig. 2-65

Number of stations exceeding the ozone alert threshold of 180 μg.m-3, the Czech Republic 2000

Fig. 2-66

Number of stations exceeding the ozone 8-hour limit value of 160 μg.m-3, the Czech Republic 2000

Fig. 2-67

Maximum measured hourly and 8-hour ozone concentrations and exceedence of ozone alert threshold (180 μg.m-3) and ozone 8-hour limit value (160 μg.m-3), 2000

Fig. 2-68

Fields of AOT40 ozone exposure index for forests, 2000

Fig. 2-69

Fields of AOT40 ozone exposure index for farm crops, 2000

Fig. 2-70

Weekly course of benzene concentrations, Libuš and Smíchov stations, 2000

Fig. 2-71

Course of half-hour benzene concentrations on working days, Saturdays and Sundays in winter and summer periods, Libuš and Smíchov stations, 2000

Fig. 2-72

Annual courses of daily concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons BTX, 2000

Fig. 2-73

Annual mean concentrations of arsenic in the atmosphere at selected stations between 1989 and 2000

Fig. 2-74

Annual mean concentrations of cadmium in the atmosphere at selected stations between 1989 and 2000

Fig. 2-75

Annual mean concentrations of lead in the atmosphere at selected stations between 1989 and 2000

Fig. 2-76

Estimate of cadmium concentration fields with presentation of measured values at stations, 2000

Fig. 2-77

Estimate of lead concentration fields with presentation of measured values at stations, 2000

Fig. 2-78

PAHs in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000, month averages

Fig. 2-79

PAHs in ambient air, Košetice 1990–2000, month averages – seasonal variation

Fig. 2-80

PCBs in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000 Fig. 2-81 alfa -HCH and gama -HCH in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000

Fig. 2-81 alfa-HCH and gama-HCH in ambient air, Košetice 1996-2000

Fig. 2-82

Hexachlorobenzene in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000

Fig. 2-83

PCBs in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000, month averages – seasonal variation

Fig. 2-84

alfa -HCH and gama -HCH in ambient air, Košetice 1996–1999, month averages – seasonal variation

Fig. 2-85

Sum of p,p-DDE, p,p-DDD and p,p-DDT in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000, month averages – seasonal variation

Fig. 2-86

Hexachlorobenzene in ambient air, Košetice 1996–2000, month averages – seasonal variation

Fig. 2-87

PAHs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999

Fig. 2-88

PAHs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999, month averages

Fig. 2-89

PCBs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999

Fig. 2-90

PCBs in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999, month averages

Fig. 2-91

HCH isomers in precipitation, Košetice 1997–1999

Fig. 2-92

p,p-DDE, p,p-DDD and p,p-DDT in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999

Fig. 2-93

Hexachlorbenzene in precipitation water, Košetice 1997–1999

Fig. 2-94

Annual courses of concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 2000

Fig. 2-95

The development of population and area proportions in air quality classes

Fig. 2-96

Classification of the Czech Republics territory in terms of air quality summary assessment, 2000

Fig. 2-97

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations, sulphur dioxide, 1990 and 2000

Fig. 2-98

Fields of annual arithmetic means of concentrations, SPM, 1990 and 2000

Fig. 2-99

Time-height cross-section of air temperature and of temperature gradients

Fig. 2-100

Area distribution of maximum average hourly concentrations of ground-level ozone during the ozone episode

Fig. 2-101

1-hour moving averages at selected urban stations, summer smog episode, the Czech Republic, 18.–23. 6. 2000, O3

Fig. 2-102

1-hour moving averages at selected rural stations, summer smog episode, the Czech Republic, 18.–23. 6. 2000, O3

Fig. 3-1

Station networks monitoring precipitation quality and atmospheric deposition, 2000 

Fig. 3-2

Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO2-4 - S), 2000

Fig. 3-3

Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2 - S), 2000

Fig. 3-4

Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2000

Fig. 3-5

Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2000

Fig. 3-6

Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO-3 - N), 2000

Fig. 3-7

Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH+4 - N), 2000

Fig. 3-8

Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2000

Fig. 3-9

Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx - N), 2000

Fig. 3-10

Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2000

Fig. 3-11

Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2000

Fig. 3-12

Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2000

Fig. 3-13

Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2000

Fig. 3-14

Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2000

Fig. 3-15

Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2000

Fig. 3-16

Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2000

Fig. 3-17

Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2000

Fig. 3-18

Fields of annual throughfall deposition of lead, 2000

Fig. 3-19

Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2000

Fig. 3-20

Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2000

Fig. 3-21

Fields of annual throughfall deposition of cadmium, 2000

Fig. 3-22

Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2000

Fig. 3-23

Annual wet deposition at selected stations between 1990 and 2000, the Czech Republic