AIT POLLUTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2000

Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - Air Quality Protection Division




LIST OF TABLES

Tab. 1-1

Total emissions of principal air pollutants from REZZO 1–4 sources in 2000

Tab. 1-2

Total emissions of principal greenhouse gases, 1990 to 1999

Tab. 1-3

Total emissions of HMs and POPs between 1990 and 2000

Tab. 1-4

Fuel consumption in REZZO 1 sources between 1990 and 2000

Tab. 1-5

Specific emissions from stationary sources in 1995 (REZZO 1–3)

Tab. 1-6

Specific emissions from stationary sources in 2000 (REZZO 1–3)

Tab. 2-1

Limit values for the Czech Republic

Tab. 2-2

Prepared limit values for health protection

Tab. 2-3

Prepared limit values for the protection of vegetation and ecosystems

Tab. 2-4

Air pollution monitoring sites, based on the owner and the regions, Czech Republic, 2000

Tab. 2-5

Air pollution monitoring sites measuring basic pollutants and supplementary quantities, AMS and AMS-SRS, based on the regions and the owner (branch), Czech Republic, 2000

Tab. 2-6

Air pollution monitoring sites measuring basic pollutants and supplementary quantities, manual and semiautomatic methods, based on the regions and the owner (branch), Czech Republic, 2000

Tab. 2-7

Total number of monitoring sites measuring the pollutants not presented in Tab. 2-5 and 2-6, based on the owner (branch), Czech Republic, 2000

Tab. 2-8

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, sulphur dioxide, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-9

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, SPM, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-10

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, PM10, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-11

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, nitrogen oxides, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-12

Stations with highest relative frequency of short-term IHk exceedence, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-13

Stations with highest values of 95th percentiles of half-hour pollutant concentrations, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-14

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at AIM stations, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-15

Highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations at AIM stations, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-16

Highest relative (absolute) frequency of exceeding IHd at AIM stations, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-17

Stations with highest values of 95th (90th) percentiles of pollutant daily concentrations, AIM, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-18

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at manual stations, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-19

Stations with highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-20

Stations with highest relative frequency of IHd exceedence, manual methods, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-21

Stations with highest values of 95th percentiles of daily pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Prague 2000

Tab. 2-22

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, sulphur dioxide, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-23

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, SPM, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-24

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, PM10, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-25

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, nitrogen oxides, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-26

Stations with highest relative frequency of short-term IHk exceedence, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-27

Stations with highest values of 95th percentiles of half-hour pollutant concentrations, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-28

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at AIM stations, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-29

Highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations at AIM stations, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-30

Highest relative (absolute) frequency of exceeding IHd at AIM stations, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-31

Stations with highest values of 95th (90th) percentiles of pollutant daily concentrations, AIM, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-32

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at manual stations, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-33

Stations with highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-34

Stations with highest relative frequency of IHd exceedence, manual methods, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-35

Stations with highest values of 95th percentiles of daily pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Central Bohemian Region 2000

Tab. 2-36

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, sulphur dioxide, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-37

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, SPM, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-38

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, PM10, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-39

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, nitrogen oxides, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-40

Stations with highest relative frequency of short-term exceedence of IHk, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-41

Stations with highest values of 95th percentiles of half-hour pollutant concentrations, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-42

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at AIM stations, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-43

Stations with highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations, AIM, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-44

Stations with highest relative (absolute) frequency of IHd exceedence, AIM, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-45

Stations with highest values of 95th (90th) percentiles of daily pollutant concentrations, AIM, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-46

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at stations, manual methods, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-47

Stations with highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-48

Stations with highest relative (absolute) frequency of IHd exceedence, manual methods, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-49

Stations with highest values of 95th (90th) percentiles of daily pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Northwest Region 2000

Tab. 2-50

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, sulphur dioxide, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-51

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, SPM, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-52

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, PM10, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-53

Annual course of concentrations and selected air pollution characteristics, nitrogen oxides, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-54

Stations with highest relative frequency of short-term exceedence of IHk, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-55

Stations with highest values of 95th percentiles of half-hour pollutant concentrations, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-56

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at AIM stations, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-57

Stations with highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations, AIM, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-58

Stations with highest relative (absolute) frequency of IHd exceedence, AIM, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-59

Stations with highest values of 95th (90th) percentiles of daily pollutant concentrations, AIM, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-60

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at stations, manual methods, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-61

Stations with highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-62

Stations with highest relative (absolute) frequency of IHd exceedence, manual methods, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-63

Stations with highest values of 95th (90th) percentiles of daily pollutant concentrations, manual methods, Moravian-Silesian Region 2000

Tab. 2-64

Highest daily pollutant concentrations at stations in the Czech Republic in 2000

Tab. 2-65

Stations with highest annual arithmetic means of pollutant concentrations, the Czech Republic 2000

Tab. 2-66

Stations with highest relative (absolute) frequency of IHd exceedence, the Czech Republic 2000

Tab. 2-67

Stations with highest values of 95th (90th) percentiles of daily pollutant concentrations, the Czech Republic 2000

Tab. 2-68

Stations with highest relative frequency of short-term exceedence of IHk, the Czech Republic 2000

Tab. 2-69

Stations with highest values of 95th percentiles of half-hour pollutant concentrations, the Czech Republic 1995

Tab. 2-70

Highest half-hour (3-hour) pollutant concentrations at stations, the Czech Republic 2000

Tab. 2-71

Annual course of concentrations and calculated annual statistical characteristics for CO, the Czech Republic 2000

Tab. 2-72

Annual course of concentrations and calculated annual statistical characteristics for ground-level ozone, the Czech Republic 2000

Tab. 2-73

Exceedence of the hourly alert threshold for ozone (180 μg.m-3) at all stations monitoring O3 concentrations in the Czech Republic, 2000

Tab. 2-74

Exceedence of the 8-hours limit value for ozone (160 μg.m-3) at all stations monitoring O3 concentrations in the Czech Republic, 2000

Tab 2-75

Overview of the air quality limit exceedences for ground-level ozone for single stations and years for the entire monitoring period

Tab. 2-76

Annual average benzene concentration at selected stations, 2000

Tab. 2-77

Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead and nickel in SPM at selected stations, 2000

Tab. 2-78

Annual cadmium, lead, arsenic and nickel fraction distribution in SPM, 2000

Tab. 2-79

Annual average benzo[a]pyrene and sum PAHs concentrations in 2000

Tab. 2-80

Observed concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Košetice observatory 2000 (gas phase, aerosol, gas phase + aerosol – minimum, maximum, arithmetic and geometric mean, median)

Tab. 2-81

Observed concentration of organochlorine pollutants (OCPs), Košetice observatory 2000 (gas phase, aerosol, gas phase + aerosol – minimum, maximum, arithmetic and geometric mean, median)

Tab. 2-82

Regional classification of ambient air quality

Tab. 2-83

Settlements with population over 3 000 in zones of ambient air quality classes No. III to No. V, 2000

Tab. 3-1

Average deposition fluxes S, N and H in the Czech Republic, 2000

Tab. 3-2

Estimate of the total annual deposition in the Czech Republic (78,841 sq. km) in tonnes, 2000

Tab. 3-3

Estimate of the total annual deposition of sulphur on the forrested part of the Czech Republic (16,990 sq. km) in tonnes, 1997–2000

Tab. 3-4

Station networks monitoring precipitation quality and atmospheric deposition, 2000

Tab. 3-5

Mean annual concentrations of principal pollutants in precipitation at given stations, 2000

Tab. 3-6

Annual wet atmospheric deposition at given stations, 2000