Fig. –1 |
Scheme of ISKO’s links to data sources and co-operating
systems 2009 |
Fig. I.1.1 |
Total emissions of basic pollutants in the Czech
Republic between 1990 and 2009 |
Fig. I.1.2 |
Changes in types of fuels in the REZZO 1 sources between
1990 and 2008 (shares of heat contained in the fuel) |
Fig. I.1.3 |
Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2009 |
Fig. I.1.4 |
Changes in the prevailing way of residential heating –
comparison of 1991, 2001 and 2009 |
Fig. I.1.5 |
Nitrogen oxides emission density from 5x5 km squares,
2008 |
Fig. I.1.6 |
Emission density of total suspended particles from 5x5
km squares, 2008 |
Fig. I.1.7 |
Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares,
2008 |
Fig. I.1.8 |
Carbon monoxide emission density from 5x5 km squares,
2008 |
Fig. I.2.1 |
Emissions of carbon dioxide structured by sectors,
1990–2008 |
Fig. I.2.2 |
Emissions of methane structured by sectors, 1990–2008 |
Fig. I.2.3 |
Emissions of nitrous oxide structured by sectors,
1990–2008 |
Fig. I.2.4 |
Emissions of F-gases, 1995–2008 |
Fig. II.1.1 |
Major station networks of ambient air quality
monitoring, 2009 |
Fig. II.1.2 |
Monitoring of basic pollutants in selected organisations –
development |
Fig. II.4.1.1 |
Annual course of monthly PM10 concentrations and number of 24-hour
PM10 limit exceedances, Prague agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.2 |
Annual course of monthly PM2.5
concentrations, Prague agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.3 |
Monthly PM2.5/PM10 proportions, Prague agglomeration,
2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.4 |
Annual course of monthly benzo(a)pyrene concentrations, Prague
agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.5 |
Annual course of monthly O3 concentrations, Prague agglomeration,
2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.6 |
Annual course of monthly NO2 concentrations at selected
stations, Prague agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.7 |
Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Prague agglomeration,
2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.8 |
Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Prague
agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.9 |
The average annual PM10 concentrations at
background and traffic stations, Brno agglomeration, 2002–2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.10 |
The influence of precipitation amounts to average
monthly PM10 concentrations, Brno agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.11 |
The influence of precipitation amounts to average
monthly SO2 concentrations, Brno agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.12 |
The average monthly concentrations of PM2.5
and PM10, Brno-Tuřany, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.13 |
The average annual NO2 concentrations at
background and traffic stations, Brno agglomeration, 2002–2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.14 |
The average monthly PAH concentrations, Brno-LÃÅ¡eň, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.15 |
26th highest 8-hour running average of O3,
Brno agglomeration, 2002–2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.16 |
Field of the annual concentration of NO2,
Brno agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.17 |
Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene,
Brno agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.18 |
Comparison of basic characteristics of meteorological
dispersion conditions in winter periods (December–February) |
Fig. II.4.1.19 |
Comparison of the levels of air pollution caused by the
PM10 fraction of suspended particles in winter periods (December–February)
in the Ostrava-Karviná area |
Fig. II.4.1.20 |
Field of the annual concentration of NO2,
Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.21 |
Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene,
Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.22 |
Annual course of monthly PM10 concentrations
and number of 24-hour PM10 limit value exceedances, Ústà nad
Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.23 |
36th highest 24-hour PM10
concentration, Ústà nad Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.24 |
Annual course of monthly PM2.5 concentrations,
Ústà nad Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.25 |
PM2.5/PM10 proportions, annual
average PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, Ústà nad
Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.26 |
Annual course of monthly benzo(a)pyrene concentrations,
Ústà nad Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.27 |
Annual course of monthly PM10 and benzo(a)pyrene
concentrations, Ústà nad Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.28 |
Annual course of monthly O3 concentrations,
Ústà nad Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.29 |
Annual course of monthly NO2 concentrations,
Ústà nad Labem Region, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.1.30 |
Trends of SO2, PM10, PM2.5,
NO2 and CO annual characteristics in agglomerations,
1996–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.1 |
4th highest 24-hour concentrations and 25th highest hourly
concentrations of SO2 in 1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.2 |
Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.3 |
Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.4 |
Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.5 |
36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average
concentrations of PM10 in 1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.6 |
Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.7 |
Field of annual average concentration of PM10
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.8 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for 24-hour
concentrations of PM10 in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.9 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for annual concentrations
of PM10 in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.10 |
Numbers of exceedances of air pollution limit value for the highest
24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.11 |
Annual average PM10 concentrations at the stations with the
exceedance of the limit value, 2004–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.12 |
Annual average concentrations of PM2.5 in the ambient air
in 2004-2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.13 |
Annual average concentration of PM2.5 at stations
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.14 |
Average monthly PM2.5/PM10 ratio
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.15 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for annual concentrations
of PM2.5 in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.16 |
19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average concentrations
of NO2 in 1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.17 |
Field of annual average concentration of NO2
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.18 |
Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.19 |
Stations with the highest exceedance of LV and LV+MT for annual
concentrations of NO2 in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.20 |
Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 1999–2009 at
selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.21 |
Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running average
concentrations of CO in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.22 |
Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1999–2009 at selected
stations |
Fig. II.4.2.23 |
Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the ambient air
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.24 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
benzene concentrations in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.25 |
26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of
ground-level ozone concentrations (three-year average) in 1999–2009 at
selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.26 |
Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average of
ground-level ozone concentrations in three-year average, 2007–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.27 |
Numbers of exceedances of the target value for the maximum daily
8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations in
three-year average, 2007–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.28 |
Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running
average concentrations of ground-level ozone in 2007–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.29 |
Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in
1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.30 |
1/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air
in 2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.31 |
Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in
1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.32 |
Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the ambient air
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.33 |
1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air
in 2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.34 |
Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in
1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.35 |
Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the ambient air
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.36 |
1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air
in 2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.37 |
Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in
1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.38 |
1/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air
in 2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.39 |
Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in the ambient air
in 1999–2009 at selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.40 |
Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the
ambient air in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.41 |
Month average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene at various types of
localities, 2004–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.42 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.43 |
Concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and PM10 particles in individual
localities, 2005–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.44 |
Trends of SO2, PM10, PM2.5, NO2, NOx and O3 annual characteristics
in the Czech Republic, 1996–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.45 |
Annual average concentrations of SO2 in 1999–2009 at selected rural
stations |
Fig. II.4.2.46 |
Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1999/2000–2009/2010 at
selected rural stations |
Fig. II.4.2.47 |
Field of annual average concentration of SO2
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.48 |
Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2009/2010 |
Fig. II.4.2.49 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
concentrations of SO2 in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.50 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest winter
concentrations of SO2 in the winter period 2009/2010 |
Fig. II.4.2.51 |
Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1999–2009 at
selected stations |
Fig. II.4.2.52 |
Field of annual average concentration of NOx
in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.53 |
24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual
concentrations of NOx in 2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.54 |
Exposure index AOT40 values of ozone in 1999–2009 at selected
stations, average for 5 years |
Fig. II.4.2.55 |
Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average for 5 years,
2005–2009 |
Fig. II.4.2.56 |
Stations with the highest exposure index AOT40 values in recent 5
years, 2005–2009 |
Fig. II.4.3.1 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to
health protection limit values, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.3.2 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to
health protection target values, ground-level ozone excluded, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.3.3 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to
health protection target values, incl. ground-level ozone, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.3.4 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to
ecosystems/vegetation protection limit values in national parks and
protected landscape areas, ground-level ozone excluded, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.3.5 |
Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to
ecosystems/vegetation protection limit values in national parks and
protected landscape areas, including ground-level ozone, 2009 |
Fig. II.4.5.1 |
Annual average PM10 concentrations, 2007 |
Fig. II.4.5.2 |
36th highest value of maximum daily average
of PM10 concentration, 2007 |
Fig. II.4.5.3 |
26th highest values of maximum daily 8-hour
running average of ground-level ozone concentrations, 2007 |
Fig. II.4.5.4 |
Rural map of the exposure index AOT40 values of ozone
for crops protection, 2007 |
Fig. II.5.1 |
Average daily air temperature, its long-term normal and
daily sum of precipitation, Prague-Libuš, 1.1.–28.2.2009 |
Fig. II.5.2 |
Average daily air temperature, its long-term normal and
daily sum of precipitation, Prague-Libuš, 1.11.–31.12.2009 |
Fig. II.5.3 |
Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the
station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.1.–28.2.2009 |
Fig. II.5.4 |
Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the
station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.10.–31.12.2009 |
Fig. II.5.5 |
Average daily PM10 concentrations at selected
stations, 1.1.–28.2.2009 |
Fig. II.5.6 |
Average daily PM10 concentrations at selected
stations, 1.11.–31.12.2009 |
Fig. II.5.7 |
Course of maximum daily air temperatures, their normals
and daily sums of precipitation at the station Prague-Libuš. Occurrence
of ozone concentrations exceeding 180 μg.m-3 in the territory
of the Czech Republic, 1.4.–30.9.2009 |
Fig. II.5.8 |
Spatial distribution of maximum daily concentrations of
ground-level ozone in the territory of the Czech Republic, 1.8.–3.8.2009 |
Fig. III.1 |
Station networks monitoring atmospheric precipitation quality and
atmospheric deposition, 2008 |
Fig. III.2 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO42–S),
2009 |
Fig. III.3 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2
- S), 2009 |
Fig. III.4 |
Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2009 |
Fig. III.5 |
Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2009 |
Fig. III.6 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3-–N),
2009 |
Fig. III.7 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4+–N),
2009 |
Fig. III.8 |
Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2009 |
Fig. III.9 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx
- N), 2009 |
Fig. III.10 |
Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2009 |
Fig. III.11 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2009 |
Fig. III.12 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to
SO2 and NOx deposition, 2009 |
Fig. III.13 |
Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2009 |
Fig. III.14 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2009 |
Fig. III.15 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2009 |
Fig. III.16 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2009 |
Fig. III.17 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2009 |
Fig. III.18 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2009 |
Fig. III.19 |
Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2009 |
Fig. III.20 |
Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2008 |
Fig. III.21 |
The development of annual deposition of sulphur (SO42-–S,
SO2–S) and oxidated forms of nitrogen (NO3-–N,
NOx–N) and hydrogen in the Czech Republic, 1995–2009 |
Fig. III.22 |
The development of the ratio of nitrate/sulphate concentrations in
atmospheric deposition (expressed as μeq. l-1) at the CHMI stations,
1998–2009 |
Fig. III.23 |
The development of annual wet deposition at selected stations in
1991–2009, Czech Republic |
Fig. IV.1 |
Map of the sites |
Fig. IV.2 |
Jizerské hory – Bukovec, sampler installation |