AIR POLLUTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2009
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - Air Quality Protection Division




LIST OF FIGURES
 
Fig. –1 Scheme of ISKO’s links to data sources and co-operating systems 2009
Fig. I.1.1 Total emissions of basic pollutants in the Czech Republic between 1990 and 2009
Fig. I.1.2 Changes in types of fuels in the REZZO 1 sources between 1990 and 2008 (shares of heat contained in the fuel)
Fig. I.1.3 Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2009
Fig. I.1.4 Changes in the prevailing way of residential heating – comparison of 1991, 2001 and 2009
Fig. I.1.5 Nitrogen oxides emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2008
Fig. I.1.6 Emission density of total suspended particles from 5x5 km squares, 2008
Fig. I.1.7 Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2008
Fig. I.1.8 Carbon monoxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2008
Fig. I.2.1 Emissions of carbon dioxide structured by sectors, 1990–2008
Fig. I.2.2 Emissions of methane structured by sectors, 1990–2008
Fig. I.2.3 Emissions of nitrous oxide structured by sectors, 1990–2008
Fig. I.2.4 Emissions of F-gases, 1995–2008
Fig. II.1.1 Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2009
Fig. II.1.2 Monitoring of basic pollutants in selected organisations – development
Fig. II.4.1.1 Annual course of monthly PM10 concentrations and number of 24-hour PM10 limit exceedances, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.2 Annual course of monthly PM2.5 concentrations, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.3 Monthly PM2.5/PM10 proportions, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.4 Annual course of monthly benzo(a)pyrene concentrations, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.5 Annual course of monthly O3 concentrations, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.6 Annual course of monthly NO2 concentrations at selected stations, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.7 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.8 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Prague agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.9 The average annual PM10 concentrations at background and traffic stations, Brno agglomeration, 2002–2009
Fig. II.4.1.10 The influence of precipitation amounts to average monthly PM10 concentrations, Brno agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.11 The influence of precipitation amounts to average monthly SO2 concentrations, Brno agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.12 The average monthly concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10, Brno-Tuřany, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.13 The average annual NO2 concentrations at background and traffic stations, Brno agglomeration, 2002–2009
Fig. II.4.1.14 The average monthly PAH concentrations, Brno-Líšeň, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.15 26th highest 8-hour running average of O3, Brno agglomeration, 2002–2009
Fig. II.4.1.16 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Brno agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.17 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Brno agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.18 Comparison of basic characteristics of meteorological dispersion conditions in winter periods (December–February)
Fig. II.4.1.19 Comparison of the levels of air pollution caused by the PM10 fraction of suspended particles in winter periods (December–February) in the Ostrava-Karviná area
Fig. II.4.1.20 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.21 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.22 Annual course of monthly PM10 concentrations and number of 24-hour PM10 limit value exceedances, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.23 36th highest 24-hour PM10 concentration, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.24 Annual course of monthly PM2.5 concentrations, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.25 PM2.5/PM10 proportions, annual average PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.26 Annual course of monthly benzo(a)pyrene concentrations, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.27 Annual course of monthly PM10 and benzo(a)pyrene concentrations, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.28 Annual course of monthly O3 concentrations, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.29 Annual course of monthly NO2 concentrations, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2009
Fig. II.4.1.30 Trends of SO2, PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and CO annual characteristics in agglomerations, 1996–2009
Fig. II.4.2.1 4th highest 24-hour concentrations and 25th highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.2 Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.3 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.4 Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.5 36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average concentrations of PM10 in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.6 Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.7 Field of annual average concentration of PM10 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.8 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for 24-hour concentrations of PM10 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.9 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for annual concentrations of PM10 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.10 Numbers of exceedances of air pollution limit value for the highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.11 Annual average PM10 concentrations at the stations with the exceedance of the limit value, 2004–2009
Fig. II.4.2.12 Annual average concentrations of PM2.5 in the ambient air in 2004-2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.13 Annual average concentration of PM2.5 at stations in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.14 Average monthly PM2.5/PM10 ratio in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.15 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for annual concentrations of PM2.5 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.16 19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average concentrations of NO2 in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.17 Field of annual average concentration of NO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.18 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.19 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV and LV+MT for annual concentrations of NO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.20 Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.21 Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.22 Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.23 Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the ambient air in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.24 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual benzene concentrations in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.25 26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations (three-year average) in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.26 Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations in three-year average, 2007–2009
Fig. II.4.2.27 Numbers of exceedances of the target value for the maximum daily 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations in three-year average, 2007–2009
Fig. II.4.2.28 Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running average concentrations of ground-level ozone in 2007–2009
Fig. II.4.2.29 Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.30 1/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in 2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.31 Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.32 Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the ambient air in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.33 1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in 2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.34 Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.35 Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the ambient air in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.36 1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in 2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.37 Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.38 1/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in 2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.39 Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in the ambient air in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.40 Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the ambient air in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.41 Month average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene at various types of localities, 2004–2009
Fig. II.4.2.42 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.43 Concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and PM10 particles in individual localities, 2005–2009
Fig. II.4.2.44 Trends of SO2, PM10, PM2.5, NO2, NOx and O3 annual characteristics in the Czech Republic, 1996–2009
Fig. II.4.2.45 Annual average concentrations of SO2 in 1999–2009 at selected rural stations
Fig. II.4.2.46 Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1999/2000–2009/2010 at selected rural stations
Fig. II.4.2.47 Field of annual average concentration of SO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.48 Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2009/2010
Fig. II.4.2.49 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of SO2 in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.50 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest winter concentrations of SO2 in the winter period 2009/2010
Fig. II.4.2.51 Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1999–2009 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.52 Field of annual average concentration of NOx in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.53 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of NOx in 2009
Fig. II.4.2.54 Exposure index AOT40 values of ozone in 1999–2009 at selected stations, average for 5 years
Fig. II.4.2.55 Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average for 5 years, 2005–2009
Fig. II.4.2.56 Stations with the highest exposure index AOT40 values in recent 5 years, 2005–2009
Fig. II.4.3.1 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection limit values, 2009
Fig. II.4.3.2 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection target values, ground-level ozone excluded, 2009
Fig. II.4.3.3 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection target values, incl. ground-level ozone, 2009
Fig. II.4.3.4 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to ecosystems/vegetation protection limit values in national parks and protected landscape areas, ground-level ozone excluded, 2009
Fig. II.4.3.5 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to ecosystems/vegetation protection limit values in national parks and protected landscape areas, including ground-level ozone, 2009
Fig. II.4.5.1 Annual average PM10 concentrations, 2007
Fig. II.4.5.2 36th highest value of maximum daily average of PM10 concentration, 2007
Fig. II.4.5.3 26th highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations, 2007
Fig. II.4.5.4 Rural map of the exposure index AOT40 values of ozone for crops protection, 2007
Fig. II.5.1 Average daily air temperature, its long-term normal and daily sum of precipitation, Prague-Libuš, 1.1.–28.2.2009
Fig. II.5.2 Average daily air temperature, its long-term normal and daily sum of precipitation, Prague-Libuš, 1.11.–31.12.2009
Fig. II.5.3 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.1.–28.2.2009
Fig. II.5.4 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.10.–31.12.2009
Fig. II.5.5 Average daily PM10 concentrations at selected stations, 1.1.–28.2.2009
Fig. II.5.6 Average daily PM10 concentrations at selected stations, 1.11.–31.12.2009
Fig. II.5.7 Course of maximum daily air temperatures, their normals and daily sums of precipitation at the station Prague-Libuš. Occurrence of ozone concentrations exceeding 180 μg.m-3 in the territory of the Czech Republic, 1.4.–30.9.2009
Fig. II.5.8 Spatial distribution of maximum daily concentrations of ground-level ozone in the territory of the Czech Republic, 1.8.–3.8.2009
Fig. III.1 Station networks monitoring atmospheric precipitation quality and atmospheric deposition, 2008
Fig. III.2 Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO42–S), 2009
Fig. III.3 Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2 - S), 2009
Fig. III.4 Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2009
Fig. III.5 Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2009
Fig. III.6 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3-–N), 2009
Fig. III.7 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4+–N), 2009
Fig. III.8 Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2009
Fig. III.9 Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx - N), 2009
Fig. III.10 Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2009
Fig. III.11 Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2009
Fig. III.12 Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2009
Fig. III.13 Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2009
Fig. III.14 Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2009
Fig. III.15 Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2009
Fig. III.16 Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2009
Fig. III.17 Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2009
Fig. III.18 Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2009
Fig. III.19 Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2009
Fig. III.20 Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2008
Fig. III.21 The development of annual deposition of sulphur (SO42-–S, SO2–S) and oxidated forms of nitrogen (NO3-–N, NOx–N) and hydrogen in the Czech Republic, 1995–2009
Fig. III.22 The development of the ratio of nitrate/sulphate concentrations in atmospheric deposition (expressed as μeq. l-1) at the CHMI stations, 1998–2009
Fig. III.23 The development of annual wet deposition at selected stations in 1991–2009, Czech Republic
Fig. IV.1 Map of the sites
Fig. IV.2 Jizerské hory – Bukovec, sampler installation